Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30258408›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Autoprobiotics as an Approach for Restoration of Personalised Microbiota.

Alexander Suvorov, Alena Karaseva, Marina Kotyleva, Yulia Kondratenko, Nadezhda Lavrenova, Anton Korobeynikov, Petr Kozyrev, Tatiana Kramskaya, Galina Leontieva, Igor Kudryavtsev and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Towards EffectiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Restoration ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Probiotics and autoprobiotics for treatment ofWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Review
  7. Female reproductive tract-organ axes.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gastrointestinal microbiome andWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander SuvorovDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Alena KarasevaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Marina KotylevaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Yulia KondratenkoDepartment of Fundamental Medicine and Medical Technologies, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Nadezhda LavrenovaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Anton KorobeynikovDepartment of Fundamental Medicine and Medical Technologies, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Petr KozyrevDepartment of Fundamental Medicine and Medical Technologies, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Tatiana KramskayaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Galina LeontievaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Igor KudryavtsevDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Danyang GuoInstitute of Agro-food Science and Technology, SAAS, Shandong, China.
Alla LapidusDepartment of Fundamental Medicine and Medical Technologies, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Elena ErmolenkoDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Institute of Experimental Medicine · RUSt Petersburg University · RUInstitute of Food Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human microbiota is a complex consortium of microorganisms involved in the proper functioning of almost every system of the organism. Majority of the human diseases are associated with the development of intestinal dysbiosis. Dysbiotic condition or dysbiosis is a key pathogenic condition causing many severe infectious or non-infectious diseases. Rapid return to the original microbiota in many cases leads to the fast recovery from the disease. However, the optimal way of the treatment of dysbiosis is still under the discussion. Recently we have developed a method of autoprobiotics based on using isolated indigenous bacteria for improving of microbiota condition. The method based on feeding the patients with bacterial products grown from their personal, genetically characterised strains have been successfully tested in clinic on patients with IBS or chronic pneumonia. In present study we tried to evaluate technology employing autoprobiotic bacteria belonging to different species employing the rat model of antibiotic induced dysbiosis. Six experimental groups of animals after taking antibiotics were treated with different variants of autoprobiotics (lactobacillus, bifidobacteria, enterococcus, their mixture, fecal microbiota, or anaerobically grown complex of indigenous microbiota) prepared for each of them before the development of dysbiosis. Judging by the multiple parameters including metagenomics analysis of microbiota, immune status and microbiota content of the animals with dysbiosis relatively to control group, the most pronounced positive changes were provided by autoprobiotics based on enterococci, bifidobacteria or the consortium of indigenous bacteria grown under anaerobic conditions. These groups of autoprobiotics were delivering the most effective restoration of the original microbiota content and significant anti-inflammatory reaction of the immune system.

Indexed as

anti-inflammatoryautoprobioticsintestinal dysbiosismicrobiomemicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID30258408
PMCPMC6144954
OpenAlexW2891617839

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.