Evidence mapPaperPMID 30260488Full record

Trial reportJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2019

Dietary Management of Blood Glucose in Medical Critically Ill Overweight and Obese Patients: An Open-Label Randomized Trial.

Todd W Rice, D Clark Files, Peter E Morris, Andrew C Bernard, Thomas R Ziegler, John W Drover, John P Kress, Kealy R Ham, Dominik J Grathwohl, Maureen B Huhmann and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nutritional priorities in patients with severe COVID-19.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Todd W RiceDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
D Clark FilesDepartment of Internal Medicine-Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Immunologic Diseases, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Peter E MorrisUniversity of Kentucky Healthcare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Andrew C BernardUniversity of Kentucky Healthcare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Thomas R ZieglerDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
John W DroverDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University and Kingston Health Science Center, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
John P KressThe University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kealy R HamDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Regions Hospital, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Dominik J GrathwohlNestlé Research Center, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Maureen B HuhmannNestlé Health Science, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.
Juan B Ochoa GautierNestlé Health Science, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.
Nestlé Health Science (United States)University of Kentucky HealthCare · USEmory University Hospital · USNestlé (Switzerland) · CHQueen's University · CARegions Hospital · USUniversity of Chicago · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Nestlé Health Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnteral nutrition (EN) increases hyperglycemia due to high carbohydrate concentrations while providing insufficient protein. The study tested whether an EN formula with very high-protein- and low-carbohydrate-facilitated glucose control delivered higher protein concentrations within a hypocaloric protocol.

methodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial with parallel design in overweight/obese mechanically ventilated critically ill patients prescribed 1.5 g protein/kg ideal body weight/day. Patients received either an experimental very high-protein (37%) and low-carbohydrate (29%) or control high-protein (25%) and conventional-carbohydrate (45%) EN formula.

resultsA prespecified interim analysis was performed after enrollment of 105 patients (52 experimental, 53 control). Protein and energy delivery for controls and experimental groups on days 1-5 were 1.2 ± 0.4 and 1.1 ± 0.3 g/kg ideal body weight/day (P = .83), and 18.2 ± 6.0 and 12.5 ± 3.7 kcals/kg ideal body weight/day (P < .0001), respectively. The combined rate of glucose events outside the range of >110 and ≤150 mg/dL were not different (P = .54, primary endpoint); thereby the trial was terminated. The mean blood glucose for the control and the experimental groups were 138 (-SD 108, +SD 177) and 126 (-SD 99, +SD 160) mg/dL (P = .004), respectively. Mean rate of glucose events >150 mg/dL decreased (Δ = -13%, P = .015), whereas that of 80-110 mg/dL increased (Δ = 14%, P = .0007). Insulin administration decreased 10.9% (95% CI, -22% to 0.1%; P = .048) in the experimental group relative to the controls. Glycemic events ≤80 mg/dL and rescue dextrose use were not different (P = .23 and P = .53).

conclusionsA very high-protein and low-carbohydrate EN formula in a hypocaloric protocol reduces hyperglycemic events and insulin requirements while increasing glycemic events between 80-110 mg/dL.

Indexed as

AgedBlood GlucoseCritical IllnessDietary CarbohydratesDietary ProteinsEnergy IntakeEnteral NutritionFemaleFood, FormulatedHumansHyperglycemiaInsulinMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightBlood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesDietary ProteinsInsulincritical careenteral formulaenteral nutritionnutritionnutrition support practiceresearch and diseases

Identifiers

PMID30260488
PMCPMC7379263
OpenAlexW2894071812

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.