Trial reportDiabetes technology & therapeutics2018
Switching from Flash Glucose Monitoring to Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes at High Hypoglycemia Risk: The Extension Phase of the I HART CGM Study.
Trial report in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04358263 (Comparison of CGM in Randomised Study of Real-time and Intermittently-scanned Systems in T1D With Normal Awareness of Hypoglycemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of CGM in Randomised Study of Real-time and Intermittently-scanned Systems in T1D With Normal Awareness of Hypoglycemia (CORRIDA)
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid closed-loop systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic modelling.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Guideline
- The Effect of Do-It-Yourself Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Variables and Participant-Reported Outcomes in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Trial.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Trial
- The effect of do-it-yourself real-time continuous glucose monitoring on psychological and glycemic variables in children with type 1 diabetes: A randomized crossover trial.Pediatric diabetes · 2022Trial
- Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial.Diabetes care · 2020Trial
- Assessment of Glucose Control Metrics by Discriminant Ratio.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2020Trial
- Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2020Trial
- Use of flash glucose-sensing technology in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide combined with CSII: a pilot study.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2020Trial
- Effect of switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycaemic outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes: A real-world, Canadian retrospective study.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Observational
- Comparison of Real-Time and Intermittently-Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Nationwide Cohort Study.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of Binary Classifiers to Predict Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
- Asia-Pacific Perspectives on the Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Optimizing Diabetes Management.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Review
- Article
- Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Is Age at Onset a Determining Factor in Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Effect of diabetes technologies on the fear of hypoglycaemia among people living with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Impact on glucometric variables and quality of life of the advanced hybrid closed-loop system in pediatric and adolescent type 1 diabetes.Journal of diabetes · 2023Article
- Potential cost savings in the United States from a reduction in sensor-detected severe hypoglycemia among users of the InPen smart insulin pen system.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023Article
- The Advanced Diabetes Technologies for Reduction of the Frequency of Hypoglycemia and Minimizing the Occurrence of Severe Hypoglycemia in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes before and during a Diabetes Camp-A Ceiling Effect?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of the clinical effects of intermittently scanned and real-time continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe I HART CGM study showed that real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) has greater beneficial impact on hypoglycemia than intermittent flash glucose monitoring (flash) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) at high risk. The impact of continuing RT-CGM or switching from flash to RT-CGM for another 8 weeks was then evaluated.
methodsProspective randomized parallel group study with an extension phase. After a 2-week run-in with blinded CGM, participants were randomized to either RT-CGM or flash for 8 weeks. All participants were then given the option to continue with RT-CGM for another 8 weeks. Glycemic outcomes at 8 weeks are compared with the 16-week endpoint.
resultsForty adults with T1D on intensified multiple daily insulin injections and with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia or a recent episode of severe hypoglycemia were included (40% female, median [IQR] age 49.5 [37.5-63.5] years, diabetes duration 30.0 [21.0-36.5] years, HbA1c 56 [48-63] mmol/mol, and Gold Score 5 [4-5]), of whom 36 completed the final 16-week extension. There was a significant reduction in percentage time in hypoglycemia (<3.0 mmol/L) in the group switching from flash to RT-CGM (from 5.0 [3.7-8.6]% to 0.8 [0.4-1.9]%, P = 0.0001), whereas no change was observed in the RT-CGM group continuing with the additional 8 weeks of RT-CGM (1.3 [0.4-2.8] vs. 1.3 [0.8-2.5], P = 0.82). Time in target (3.9-10 mmol/L) increased in the flash group after switching to RT-CGM (60.0 [54.5-67.8] vs. 67.4 [56.3-72.4], P = 0.02) and remained the same in the RT-CGM group that continued with RT-CGM (65.9 [54.1-74.8] vs. 64.9 [49.2-73.9], P = 0.64).
conclusionsOur data suggest that switching from flash to RT-CGM has a significant beneficial impact on hypoglycemia outcomes and that continued use of RT-CGM maintains hypoglycemia risk benefit in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.