SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2019
Risk factors for inadequate response to ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction cycles: systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual Impact of Estradiol Fluctuations in the Final Three Days on IVF/ICSI Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2025Article
- Single euploid embryo transfer outcomes following cancer and systemic chemotherapy.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Adapted Exosomes for Addressing Chemotherapy-induced Premature Ovarian Insufficiency.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Article
- Successful Pregnancy in a PCOS Patient with Elevated Basal Luteinizing Hormone and Repeated Ovulation Induction Failures: A Case Report.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Is the length of time between endometrial scratching and embryo transfer important for pregnancy success? An observational study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023Observational
- Genetics of Female Infertility: Molecular Study of Newborn Ovary Homeobox Gene in Poor Ovarian Responders.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeControlled ovarian stimulation is a fundamental part of a successful assisted reproduction treatment, and recognizing patients at risk of a poor response allows the development of targeted research to propose new treatment strategies for this specific group. The objective of this systematic review was to determine risk factors for poor ovarian response (POR) to controlled stimulation in assisted reproduction cycles described in the literature.
methodsThe primary databases MEDLINE, Cochrane, LILACS, and SciELO were consulted, using specific terms with a restriction for articles in English or Portuguese published in the last 10 years. RESULTS AND
conclusionOur data suggest that environmental endocrine disruptors, tobacco, genetic mutations, endometriomas, ovarian surgery, chemotherapy, and short menstrual cycles are factors that influence stimulation in assisted reproduction cycles. Further studies are necessary for characterizing patients with prior risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.