Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30283664›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2018

Male-biased gene expression resolves sexual conflict through the evolution of sex-specific genetic architecture.

Alison E Wright, Matteo Fumagalli, Christopher R Cooney, Natasha I Bloch, Filipe G Vieira, Severine D Buechel, Niclas Kolm, Judith E Mank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Expression Divergence in Response to Sex-biased Selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The battle of the sexes in humans is highly polygenic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. On the resolution of sexual conflict over shared traits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Polygenic response of sex chromosomes to sexual antagonism.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alison E WrightDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield Sheffield United Kingdom.
Matteo FumagalliDepartment of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Christopher R CooneyDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield Sheffield United Kingdom.
Natasha I BlochDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment University College London London United Kingdom.
Filipe G VieiraCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Severine D BuechelDepartment of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Niclas KolmDepartment of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
Judith E MankDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment University College London London United Kingdom.

Funding

European Research Council 260233European Research Council 680951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many genes are subject to contradictory selection pressures in males and females, and balancing selection resulting from sexual conflict has the potential to substantially increase standing genetic diversity in populations and thereby act as an important force in adaptation. However, the underlying causes of sexual conflict, and the potential for resolution, remains hotly debated. Using transcriptome-resequencing data from male and female guppies, we use a novel approach, combining patterns of genetic diversity and intersexual divergence in allele frequency, to distinguish the different scenarios that give rise to sexual conflict, and how this conflict may be resolved through regulatory evolution. We show that reproductive fitness is the main source of sexual conflict, and this is resolved via the evolution of male-biased expression. Furthermore, resolution of sexual conflict produces significant differences in genetic architecture between males and females, which in turn lead to specific alleles influencing sex-specific viability. Together, our findings suggest an important role for sexual conflict in shaping broad patterns of genome diversity, and show that regulatory evolution is a rapid and efficient route to the resolution of conflict.

Indexed as

Balancing selectiongene expressionpopulation geneticssexual conflict

Identifiers

PMID30283664
PMCPMC6089503

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.