Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30323016›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2019

Toward the Optical Cochlear Implant.

Tobias Dombrowski, Vladan Rankovic, Tobias Moser

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Microbial Rhodopsins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Molecular Biology of Microbial Rhodopsins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Current Topics of Optogenetics for Medical Applications Toward Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias DombrowskiInstitute for Auditory Neuroscience and InnerEarLab, University Medical Center, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Vladan RankovicInstitute for Auditory Neuroscience and InnerEarLab, University Medical Center, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Tobias MoserInstitute for Auditory Neuroscience and InnerEarLab, University Medical Center, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
German Primate Center · DERuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When hearing fails, cochlear implants (CIs) provide open speech perception to most of the currently half a million CI users. CIs bypass the defective sensory organ and stimulate the auditory nerve electrically. The major bottleneck of current CIs is the poor coding of spectral information, which results from wide current spread from each electrode contact. As light can be more conveniently confined, optical stimulation of the auditory nerve presents a promising perspective for a fundamental advance of CIs. Moreover, given the improved frequency resolution of optical excitation and its versatility for arbitrary stimulation patterns the approach also bears potential for auditory research. Here, we review the current state of the art focusing on the emerging concept of optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway. Developing optogenetic stimulation for auditory research and future CIs requires efforts toward viral gene transfer to the neurons, design and characterization of appropriate optogenetic actuators, as well as engineering of multichannel optical implants.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsOptogeneticsSpeech PerceptionAnimalsAuditory PathwaysCochlear ImplantationDeafnessHumansProsthesis Design

Identifiers

PMID30323016
PMCPMC6671933
OpenAlexW2896408860

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.