Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30340639›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Developing an implementation strategy for a digital health intervention: an example in routine healthcare.

Jamie Ross, Fiona Stevenson, Charlotte Dack, Kingshuk Pal, Carl May, Susan Michie, Maria Barnard, Elizabeth Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Feasibility and Acceptability of mPallCareJMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Strategies to promote the dissemination of psychosocial digital health resources for those affected by cancer: scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jamie RossResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, Upper 3rd floor, Royal Free hospital, Rowland Hill St, London, NW32PF, UK. jamie.ross@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8720-5911
Fiona StevensonResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, Upper 3rd floor, Royal Free hospital, Rowland Hill St, London, NW32PF, UK.
Charlotte DackDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Kingshuk PalResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, Upper 3rd floor, Royal Free hospital, Rowland Hill St, London, NW32PF, UK.
Carl MayFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Susan MichieHealth Psychology, UCL, London, UK.
Maria BarnardDepartment of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Elizabeth MurrayResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, Upper 3rd floor, Royal Free hospital, Rowland Hill St, London, NW32PF, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0609-10135Programme Grants for Applied Research RP-PG-0609-10135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence on how to implement new interventions into complex healthcare environments is often poorly reported and indexed, reducing its potential to inform initiatives to improve healthcare services. Using the implementation of a digital intervention within routine National Health Service (NHS) practice, we provide an example of how to develop a theoretically based implementation plan and how to report it transparently. In doing so we also highlight some of the challenges to implementation in routine healthcare.

methodsThe implemented intervention was HeLP-Diabetes, a digital self-management programme for people with Type 2 Diabetes, which was effective in improving diabetes control. The target setting for the implementation was an inner city London Clinical Commissioning Group in the NHS comprised of 34 general practices. HeLP-Diabetes was designed to be offered to patients as part of routine diabetes care across England. Evidence synthesis, engagement of local stakeholders, a theory of implementation (Normalization Process Theory), feedback, qualitative interviews and usage data were used to develop an implementation plan.

resultsA new implementation plan was developed to implement HeLP-Diabetes within routine practice. Individual component strategies were selected and developed informed by Normalization Process Theory. These strategies included: engagement of local opinion leaders, provision of educational materials, educational visits, educational meetings, audit and feedback and reminders. Additional strategies were introduced iteratively to address barriers that arose during the implementation. Barriers largely related to difficulties in allocating resources to implement the intervention within routine care.

conclusionThis paper provides a worked example of implementing a digital health intervention. The learning from this work can inform others undertaking the work of planning and executing implementation activities in routine healthcare. Of particular importance is: the selection of appropriate theory to guide the implementation process and selection of strategies; ensuring that enough attention is paid to planning implementation; and a flexible approach that allows response to emerging barriers.

Indexed as

Health Plan ImplementationTelemedicineDelivery of Health CareDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EnglandEvidence-Based PracticeHumansProgram DevelopmentDelivery of health careDiabetes mellitusDigital healthHealthcareHealth plan implementationImplementationImplementation planningImplementation strategyImplementation theoriesRoutine practiceType 2

Identifiers

PMID30340639
PMCPMC6194634

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.