Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30348176›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

Adjusting a mainstream weight management intervention for people with intellectual disabilities: a user centred approach.

Liz Croot, Melanie Rimmer, Sarah Salway, Chris Hatton, Emma Dowse, Jacquie Lavin, Sarah E Bennett, Janet Harris, Alicia O'Cathain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liz CrootSchool of Health and Related Research, Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK. l.croot@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3666-6264
Melanie RimmerSchool of Health and Related Research, Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK.
Sarah SalwaySchool of Health and Related Research, Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK.
Chris HattonFaculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Emma DowseSlimming World Health and Research Team, Slimming World, Alfreton, UK.
Jacquie LavinSlimming World Health and Research Team, Slimming World, Alfreton, UK.
Sarah E BennettSlimming World Health and Research Team, Slimming World, Alfreton, UK.
Janet HarrisSchool of Health and Related Research, Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK.
Alicia O'CathainSchool of Health and Related Research, Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with intellectual disabilities (ID) may not be able to access and respond to uniformly delivered health interventions. Public bodies have a legal duty to make 'reasonable adjustments' to policies and practices to provide fair access and treatment for people with ID. This study aimed to identify adjustments to the Slimming World weight management programme to improve accessibility and assess acceptability and feasibility for this population.

methodsThis user-centred qualitative study was carried out with a steering group of people with ID (n = 4). Barriers and facilitators to using Slimming World were identified through interviews and focus groups with people with ID (n = 54), carers (n = 12) current members with ID (n = 8) and Slimming World group leaders (n = 11). Adjustments were made and their feasibility and acceptability were explored in a before-and-after mixed methods study where people with ID attended Slimming World for eight weeks. Participants (n = 9), carers (n = 7) and Slimming World group leaders (n = 4) were interviewed to explore their experiences of the adjustments. Participants were weighed at baseline then each week.

resultsFour key adjustments were identified and addressed by Slimming World who developed prototype Easy Read materials and a letter for carers. Six of the nine participants attended Slimming World for eight weeks and lost weight (1.4 kg to 6.6 kg, reduction in BMI between 0.5 and 1.7 kg/m2), indicating that the adjustments were feasible and acceptable. Two participants dropped out because they felt uncomfortable in a mainstream group and another left because they lacked control over food choice in their residential setting.

conclusionsThis user-centred approach identified reasonable adjustments that were feasible to implement. In a small uncontrolled feasibility study, people with ID were positive about the adjustments and lost weight. However, issues in the wider context of people's lives, such as obesogenic environments and concerns about joining mainstream groups, limited the acceptability of Slimming World even with these adjustments. These findings have important implications for policy and suggest that environmental and organisational level interventions are needed alongside those targeting individual behaviour to tackle the obesogenic environment in which many people with ID spend their time, in order to reduce inequalities associated with the consequences of obesity.

Indexed as

AdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIntellectual DisabilityObesityQualitative ResearchSocial DiscriminationBehaviour changeComplex interventionIntellectual disabilityIntervention developmentObesityQualitativeUser centredWeight management

Identifiers

PMID30348176
PMCPMC6198382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.