Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30354717›Full record

SynthesisHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2018

Prognostic Value of Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension.

Sante D Pierdomenico, Anna M Pierdomenico, Francesca Coccina, Denis L Clement, Marc L De Buyzere, Dirk A De Bacquer, Iddo Z Ben-Dov, Wanpen Vongpatanasin, José R Banegas, Luis M Ruilope and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The role of wearable home blood pressure monitoring in detecting out-of-office control status.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Observational
  15. Nocturnal systolic blood pressure dipping and progression of chronic kidney disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  16. Home blood pressure measurement: the original and the best for predicting the risk.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sante D PierdomenicoFrom the Department of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences (S.D.P.), University Gabriele d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Anna M PierdomenicoDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences (A.M.P., F.C.), University Gabriele d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Francesca CoccinaDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences (A.M.P., F.C.), University Gabriele d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Denis L ClementDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases (D.L.C., M.L.D.B.), Ghent University, Belgium.
Marc L De BuyzereDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases (D.L.C., M.L.D.B.), Ghent University, Belgium.
Dirk A De BacquerDepartment of Public Health (D.A.D.B.), Ghent University, Belgium.
Iddo Z Ben-DovNephrology and Hypertension, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (I.Z.B.-D.).
Wanpen VongpatanasinHypertension Section, Cardiology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (W.V.).
José R BanegasDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/IdiPAZ (Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz) and CIBERESP (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública), Spain (J.R.B., L.M.R.).
Luis M RuilopeDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/IdiPAZ (Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz) and CIBERESP (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública), Spain (J.R.B., L.M.R.).
Lutgarde ThijsDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Belgium (L.T., J.A.S.).
Jan A StaessenDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Belgium (L.T., J.A.S.).

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
UT Southwestern O'Brien Kidney Research Core CenterP30DK079328 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MOE, ORSON W · 2007 to 2021
$16.9M
Hypertension, intracranial pulsatility and brain A-beta accumulation in older adultsR01AG057571 · NIA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI VONGPATANASIN, WANPEN, ZHANG, RONG · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Preventing Hypertension and Sympathetic Overactivation by Targeting PhosphateR01HL133179 · NHLBI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SCOTT A, VONGPATANASIN, WANPEN · 2017 to 2020
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133179NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057571NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic relevance of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) is incompletely clear, and its global impact on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis on the prognostic value of MUCH. We searched for articles assessing outcome in patients with MUCH compared with those with controlled hypertension (CH) and reporting adjusted hazard ratio and 95% CI. We identified 6 studies using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (12 610 patients with 933 events) and 5 using home blood pressure measurement (17 742 patients with 394 events). The global population included 30 352 patients who experienced 1327 events. Selected studies had cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality as primary outcome, and the main result is a composite of these events. The overall adjusted hazard ratio was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.57-2.06) for MUCH versus CH. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that adjusted hazard ratio was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.52-2.21) in studies using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and 1.75 (95% CI, 1.38-2.20) in those using home blood pressure measurement. Risk was significantly higher in MUCH than in CH independently of follow-up length and types of studied events. MUCH was at significantly higher risk than CH in all ethnic groups, but the highest hazard ratio was found in studies, including black patients. Risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality is significantly higher in patients with MUCH than in those with CH. MUCH detected by ambulatory or home blood pressure measurement seems to convey similar prognostic information.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMasked HypertensionAgedBlood Pressure DeterminationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityObservational Studies as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsblood pressurehypertensionmasked hypertensionmortalityrisk

Identifiers

PMID30354717
PMCPMC6205750

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.