Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30361906›Full record

SynthesisPathology oncology research : POR2019

Correlation Between Tumor Vasculogenic Mimicry and Poor Prognosis of Human Digestive Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hong-Yue Ren, Jin-Xing Shen, Xiao-Mei Mao, Xiao-Yun Zhang, Pan Zhou, Si-Yang Li, Zhi-Wei Zheng, Dong-Yan Shen, Jia-Rong Meng

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hong-Yue RenDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Southeast Hospital of Xiamen University, Zhangzhou, 363000, Fujian Province, China.
Jin-Xing ShenBiobank, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, No 55 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian Province, China.
Xiao-Mei MaoBiobank, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, No 55 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian Province, China.
Xiao-Yun ZhangBiobank, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, No 55 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian Province, China.
Pan ZhouBiobank, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, No 55 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian Province, China.
Si-Yang LiBiobank, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, No 55 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian Province, China.
Zhi-Wei ZhengBiobank, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, No 55 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian Province, China.
Dong-Yan ShenBiobank, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, No 55 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian Province, China. shendongyan@163.com.
Jia-Rong MengDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Southeast Hospital of Xiamen University, Zhangzhou, 363000, Fujian Province, China. mengjiarong175@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9256-1400
First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University · CNXiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vasculogenic mimicry (VM) is a new pattern of blood supplement independent of endothelial vessels, which is related with tumor invasion, metastasis and prognosis. However, the role of VM in the prognosis of cancer patients is controversial. This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis of the published data to attempt to clarify the prognostic value of VM in the digestive cancer. Relevant studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP databases published before March 29, 2018. Studies were included if they detected VM in the digestive cancer and analyzed the overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) according to VM status. Two independent reviewers screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of included studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 12.0 software. A total of 22 studies with 2411 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that VM was related with the poor OS (HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 2.06-2.56, P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 2.60, 95% CI: 2.07-3.27, P < 0.001) of patients with digestive cancer. Subgroup analysis showed VM was related with tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage. Moreover, the present meta-analysis was reliable, and there was no obvious publication bias. This meta-analysis suggested that VM was a poor prognosis of digestive cancer patients. Further large and well-designed studies are required.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationDisease-Free SurvivalGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeovascularization, PathologicPrognosisdigestive cancermeta-analysisprognosisVasculogenic mimicry

Identifiers

PMID30361906
OpenAlexW2898588611

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.