ReviewCurrent genetics2019
Circadian rhythms, metabolic oscillators, and the target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway: the Neurospora connection.
Review in Current genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individual peroxiredoxin or Tor pathway components are not required for circadian clock function in Neurospora crassa.Fungal biology · 2025Article
- Studying the Human Microbiota: Advances in Understanding the Fundamentals, Origin, and Evolution of Biological Timekeeping.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The Case for the Target of Rapamycin Pathway as a Candidate Circadian Oscillator.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Shared Components of the FRQ-Less Oscillator and TOR Pathway Maintain Rhythmicity inJournal of biological rhythms · 2021Article
- Two dominant selectable markers for genetic manipulation in Neurospora crassa.Current genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Circadian (24-h) rhythmicity is a fundamental property of eukaryotic cells, and it is not surprising that it intersects with fundamental metabolic processes. Many links between these two processes have been documented, and speculation has been growing that there may be circadian "metabolic oscillators" that interact with and exist independently of the well-known circadian transcription/translation feedback loops (TTFLs) that have been extensively studied. This review takes a critical look at the evidence for the existence of metabolic oscillators at the cellular level, attempting to answer these questions: does metabolism affect circadian rhythmicity, and vice versa? Is metabolism rhythmic, and if so, is that rhythmicity cell autonomous? Systems displaying "non-canonical rhythmicity" in the absence of functional TTFLs provide opportunities for identifying metabolic oscillators, and this review emphasizes the fungus Neurospora crassa as a model system. Recent papers describing links between the target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling pathway and circadian rhythmicity are highlighted, suggesting the potential for TOR signaling in generating rhythmicity independent of TTFLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.