ArticleGenome biology2018
Bottlenecks for genome-edited crops on the road from lab to farm.
Article in Genome biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation CRISPR systems and advanced delivery paradigms for precision crop improvement: a comparative case study in sugar beet (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Rethinking gene-edited crop regulation: advancing a Principle-based framework for modern biotechnology governance.GM crops & food · 2025Review
- Regulation as key to fulfilling the promises of agricultural genomics: Going beyond bottlenecks in plant gene technology development.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Current Biological Insights ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Pangenomes as a Resource to Accelerate Breeding of Under-Utilised Crop Species.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Expanding Gene-Editing Potential in Crop Improvement with Pangenomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Smart breeding approaches in post-genomics era for developing climate-resilient food crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Plant Co-expression Annotation Resource: a web server for identifying targets for genetically modified crop breeding pipelines.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Soybean Yield Formation Physiology - A Foundation for Precision Breeding Based Improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom - A Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Recent Findings Unravel Genes and Genetic Factors UnderlyingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Co-production of DHA and squalene by thraustochytrid from forest biomass.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Global Role of Crop Genomics in the Face of Climate Change.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Progresses, Challenges, and Prospects of Genome Editing in Soybean (Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Article
- Simultaneous production of DHA and squalene fromBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019Article
- In the name of the rose: a roadmap for rose research in the genome era.Horticulture research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene discovery and government regulation are bottlenecks for the widespread adoption of genome-edited crops. We propose a culture of sharing and integrating crop data to accelerate the discovery and prioritization of candidate genes, as well as a strong engagement with governments and the public to address environmental and health concerns and to achieve appropriate regulatory standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.