ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2019
Functional Dyspepsia: Clinical Symptoms, Psychological Findings, and GCSI Scores.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effect of therapeutic massage combined with conventional therapy in children with functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Distinct psychophysiological biomarkers and risk stratification models for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) and diarrhea (IBS-D).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Alterations in gut microbiome and fecal metabolome in functional dyspepsia patients: insights into pathophysiological mechanisms.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Protective Effects of Fucoidan on Iodoacetamide-Induced Functional Dyspepsia via Modulation of 5-HT Metabolism and Microbiota.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Application and value of anxiety and depression scale in patients with functional dyspepsia.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Gastric-filling ultrasonography to evaluate gastric motility in patients with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- Gastroparesis: Myths, Misconceptions, and Management.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Clinical Effect of Acupuncture Combined with Traditional Chinese Medicine Application on the Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia in Children and the Influence on Serum 5-HT and NO Levels.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Survey of Gastroparesis in Asia by Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2021Article
- Quantifying Liver-Stomach Disharmony Pattern of Functional Dyspepsia Using Multidimensional Analysis Methods.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Article
- Gastroparesis Versus Functional Dyspepsia: Still Running on Emptying.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Article
- History-taking, Clinical Signs, Tests and Scores for Detection of Non-organic Dyspepsia (NOD) Among Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain (AAP).Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe GCSI questionnaire measures symptoms of gastroparesis (GP). Symptoms of FD overlap with GP. The ability of the GCSI to discriminate FD from GP is unknown.
aimsBy prospectively evaluating functional dyspepsia (FD) patients, we aimed to evaluate the ability of the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) to: (1) distinguish FD from GP; (2) predict symptom severity, anxiety, and depression; (3) correlate symptoms with gastric emptying.
methodsFD patients (Rome III criteria) were identified, and upper endoscopy and gastric emptying scan (GES) data recorded. A total of 254 patients were mailed a questionnaire evaluating demographics, FD symptoms, mental well-being; the GCSI was included.
resultsOne hundred and twenty-three patients responded; of them, 75% were women and mean age was 49 (15 SD) years. 44.7% were categorized as postprandial distress subtype (PDS), 34.1% were epigastric pain subtype (EPS), and 21.1% were mixed type. The mean GCSI score was 2.02 (1.1 SD), slightly lower than historical GP controls (2.26-2.56). Mixed EPS-PDS subtype had the lowest GCSI scores (1.79; 0.91 SD). Bloating was the highest GCSI subscore (2.70; 1.53 SD), followed by fullness (2.31; 1.39 SD) and nausea (1.08; 1.19 SD). The GCSI total score did not correlate with anxiety and depression scores or with 4-h gastric emptying.
conclusionsIn this population of FD patients, GCSI scores were slightly lower than historical gastroparesis control patients, although within the reported range. These results suggest that the GCSI cannot accurately distinguish FD patients from GP patients. A more specific questionnaire is needed to aid in the diagnosis and management of these distinct gastrointestinal disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30382539What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.