Trial reportCardiovascular diabetology2018
Impact of intravenous exenatide infusion for perioperative blood glucose control on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injuries after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: sub study of the phase II/III ExSTRESS randomized trial.
Trial report in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01969149 (Intravenous Exenatide), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intravenous Exenatide (Byetta®) Versus Insulin for Perioperative Glycemic Control in Cardiac Surgery: the Open-labeled Randomized Phase II/III ExStress Study
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative management of patients taking glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) multidisciplinary consensus statement.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Pooled it
- Cardiovascular outcomes in trials of new antidiabetic drug classes: a network meta-analysis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2019Pooled it
- Comparison of the effects of twice-daily exenatide and insulin on carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a 52-week randomized, open-label, controlled trial.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2020Trial
- Association of Perioperative Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Postoperative Outcomes.Annals of surgery · 2025Observational
- The impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the patients undergoing anesthesia or sedation: systematic review and meta-analysis.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: cardiovascular benefits and mechanisms of action.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2023Review
- Redefining diabetes mellitus treatments according to different mechanisms beyond hypoglycaemic effect.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in Prediction and Diagnosis of Early Postoperative Hypoxemia after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
- Glycaemic Control in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: What Is the Role for the Novel Antidiabetic Agents?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Role of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2021Article
- Glucose-lowering therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021Review
- Effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors on cardiac structure and function: a narrative review of clinical evidence.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2021Review
- Cardiovascular Outcomes in Trials of New Antidiabetic Drug Classes.Cardiac failure review · 2021Review
- Management of Inpatient Hyperglycemia and Diabetes in Older Adults.Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2020Review
- Effects of Liraglutide on Myocardial Function After Cardiac Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomised Controlled GLOBE Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- High-sensitivity troponin I and B-type natriuretic peptide biomarkers for prediction of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2019Article
- Debate on Insulin vs Non-insulin Use in the Hospital Setting-Is It Time to Revise the Guidelines for the Management of Inpatient Diabetes?Current diabetes reports · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the study was to investigate whether intravenous (iv) infusion of exenatide, a synthetic GLP-1 receptor agonist, could provide a protective effect against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
methodsA sub study analysis of patients > 18 years admitted for elective CABG and included in the ExSTRESS trial was conducted. Patients were randomized to receive either iv exenatide (1-h bolus of 0.05 µg min
resultsFinally, 43 and 49 patients were analyzed in the control and exenatide groups, respectively {age: 69 [61-76] versus 71 [63-75] years; baseline LVEF < 50%: 6 (14%) versus 16 (32%) patients; on-pump surgery: 29 (67%) versus 33 (67%) patients}. The primary outcome did not significantly differ between the two groups (3.34 [1.06-6.19] µg l
conclusionsPostoperative iv exenatide did not provide any additional cardioprotective effect compared to iv insulin in low-risk patients undergoing scheduled CABG surgery. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01969149, date of registration: January 7th, 2015; EudraCT No. 2009-009254-25 A, date of registration: January 6th, 2009.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.