ArticleJournal of neurovirology2019
Multimodal techniques failed to detect cytomegalovirus in human glioblastoma samples.
Article in Journal of neurovirology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of human cytomegalovirus in glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Does human cytomegalovirus provide a novel therapeutic target for patients with glioblastoma?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Cytomegalovirus-Specific Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma Treatments.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2022Review
- Molecular Investigation of Human Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in Glioblastoma Brain Tumor: A Case-Control Study in IranIranian biomedical journal · 2021Article
- Review
- Predictive factors of human cytomegalovirus reactivation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.Journal of neurovirology · 2021Observational
- Fractalkine/CX3CL1 in Neoplastic Processes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) in gliomagenesis is largely debated. Contradictory data exist regarding the sensitivity and specificity of HCMV detection techniques, including immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), and RNA and DNA sequencing. The aim of this study is to detect HCMV in glioblastoma (GBM) tumor samples using IHC, ISH, and real-time PCR (qPCR), as well as to correlate the findings with serological status and HCMV DNA load in blood. Forty-seven patients with histopathological diagnosis of GBM and HCMV serological status were retrospectively reviewed. HCMV DNA quantification in whole blood was performed in 31 patients. The detection of HCMV in tumor samples was performed using IHC in 42 cases, ISH in 10 cases, and qPCR in 29 cases. All but two patients were taking high steroid doses at the time of biological testing. HCMV seroprevalence was 68%. Active infection with HCMV DNA detected in blood was diagnosed in 6 out of 21 (28%) seropositive patients. HCMV was not detected in GBM samples using IHC or ISH, while qPCR was positive in one case (also positive for blood HCMV DNA). These data do not support a crucial role of HCMV in GBM tumorigenesis. HCMV might be reactivated in GBM patients, due to steroid treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.