Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30404302›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2016

Organ-Tumor-on-a-Chip for Chemosensitivity Assay: A Critical Review.

Navid Kashaninejad, Mohammad Reza Nikmaneshi, Hajar Moghadas, Amir Kiyoumarsi Oskouei, Milad Rismanian, Maryam Barisam, Mohammad Said Saidi, Bahar Firoozabadi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Advances in the Model Structure of In Vitro Vascularized Organ-on-a-Chip.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Navid KashaninejadSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 11155-9567 Tehran, Iran. navid.knejad@gmail.com.
Mohammad Reza NikmaneshiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 11155-9567 Tehran, Iran. morenik1367@gmail.com.
Hajar MoghadasSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 11155-9567 Tehran, Iran. moghadas_stu@yahoo.com.
Amir Kiyoumarsi OskoueiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 11155-9567 Tehran, Iran. amirkiumarsi@gmail.com.
Milad RismanianSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 11155-9567 Tehran, Iran. milad_rismanian@yahoo.com.
Maryam BarisamSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 11155-9567 Tehran, Iran. barisam.m@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6608-5842
Mohammad Said SaidiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 11155-9567 Tehran, Iran. mssaidi@sharif.edu.
Bahar FiroozabadiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 11155-9567 Tehran, Iran. firoozabadi@sharif.edu.
Sharif University of Technology · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With a mortality rate over 580,000 per year, cancer is still one of the leading causes of death worldwide. However, the emerging field of microfluidics can potentially shed light on this puzzling disease. Unique characteristics of microfluidic chips (also known as micro-total analysis system) make them excellent candidates for biological applications. The ex vivo approach of tumor-on-a-chip is becoming an indispensable part of personalized medicine and can replace in vivo animal testing as well as conventional in vitro methods. In tumor-on-a-chip, the complex three-dimensional (3D) nature of malignant tumor is co-cultured on a microfluidic chip and high throughput screening tools to evaluate the efficacy of anticancer drugs are integrated on the same chip. In this article, we critically review the cutting edge advances in this field and mainly categorize each tumor-on-a-chip work based on its primary organ. Specifically, design, fabrication and characterization of tumor microenvironment; cell culture technique; transferring mechanism of cultured cells into the microchip; concentration gradient generators for drug delivery; in vitro screening assays of drug efficacy; and pros and cons of each microfluidic platform used in the recent literature will be discussed separately for the tumor of following organs: (1) Lung; (2) Bone marrow; (3) Brain; (4) Breast; (5) Urinary system (kidney, bladder and prostate); (6) Intestine; and (7) Liver. By comparing these microchips, we intend to demonstrate the unique design considerations of each tumor-on-a-chip based on primary organ, e.g., how microfluidic platform of lung-tumor-on-a-chip may differ from liver-tumor-on-a-chip. In addition, the importance of heart⁻liver⁻intestine co-culture with microvasculature in tumor-on-a-chip devices for in vitro chemosensitivity assay will be discussed. Such system would be able to completely evaluate the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) of anticancer drugs and more realistically recapitulate tumor in vivo-like microenvironment.

Indexed as

cancer in microfluidicsconcentration gradient generatorsdrug efficacy testingin vitro assaysmicrochip cell culturespheroidstumor microenvironmenttumor-on-a-chip

Identifiers

PMID30404302
PMCPMC6190381
OpenAlexW2501821639

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.