ReviewMicromachines2016
Organ-Tumor-on-a-Chip for Chemosensitivity Assay: A Critical Review.
Review in Micromachines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Organ-on-a-chip platforms for disease modeling and in vitro diagnostic applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Advances in the Model Structure of In Vitro Vascularized Organ-on-a-Chip.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Emerging trends in organ-on-a-chip systems for drug screening.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2023Review
- Efficacy of recombinant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin containing dltA inInvestigative and clinical urology · 2023Article
- A survey of open questions in adaptive therapy: Bridging mathematics and clinical translation.eLife · 2023Article
- Experimental in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo models in prostate cancer research.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- Organs-on-Chips Platforms Are Everywhere: A Zoom on Biomedical Investigation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Biofabrication approaches and regulatory framework of metastatic tumor-on-a-chip models for precision oncology.Medicinal research reviews · 2022Review
- Immunotherapeutic effects of recombinant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin containingInvestigative and clinical urology · 2022Article
- Drug-Induced Nephrotoxicity Assessment in 3D Cellular Models.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Droplet microfluidic devices for organized stem cell differentiation into germ cells: capabilities and challenges.Biophysical reviews · 2021Review
- Live cell molecular analysis of primary prostate cancer organoids identifies persistent androgen receptor signaling.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2021Article
- A Proof-of-Concept Study Using Numerical Simulations of an Acoustic Spheroid-on-a-Chip Platform for Improving 3D Cell Culture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Self-Assembling Polypeptide Hydrogels as a Platform to Recapitulate the Tumor Microenvironment.Cancers · 2021Article
- Tissue Chips and Microphysiological Systems for Disease Modeling and Drug Testing.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Tumor-on-a-chip: from bioinspired design to biomedical application.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2021Review
- Benefits of functional assays in personalized cancer medicine: more than just a proof-of-concept.Theranostics · 2021Review
- Patterning Biological Gels for 3D Cell Culture inside Microfluidic Devices by Local Surface Modification through Laminar Flow Patterning.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Tumor-on-a-chip for integrating a 3D tumor microenvironment: chemical and mechanical factors.Lab on a chip · 2020Review
- Microfluidic technologies to engineer mesenchymal stem cell aggregates-applications and benefits.Biophysical reviews · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With a mortality rate over 580,000 per year, cancer is still one of the leading causes of death worldwide. However, the emerging field of microfluidics can potentially shed light on this puzzling disease. Unique characteristics of microfluidic chips (also known as micro-total analysis system) make them excellent candidates for biological applications. The ex vivo approach of tumor-on-a-chip is becoming an indispensable part of personalized medicine and can replace in vivo animal testing as well as conventional in vitro methods. In tumor-on-a-chip, the complex three-dimensional (3D) nature of malignant tumor is co-cultured on a microfluidic chip and high throughput screening tools to evaluate the efficacy of anticancer drugs are integrated on the same chip. In this article, we critically review the cutting edge advances in this field and mainly categorize each tumor-on-a-chip work based on its primary organ. Specifically, design, fabrication and characterization of tumor microenvironment; cell culture technique; transferring mechanism of cultured cells into the microchip; concentration gradient generators for drug delivery; in vitro screening assays of drug efficacy; and pros and cons of each microfluidic platform used in the recent literature will be discussed separately for the tumor of following organs: (1) Lung; (2) Bone marrow; (3) Brain; (4) Breast; (5) Urinary system (kidney, bladder and prostate); (6) Intestine; and (7) Liver. By comparing these microchips, we intend to demonstrate the unique design considerations of each tumor-on-a-chip based on primary organ, e.g., how microfluidic platform of lung-tumor-on-a-chip may differ from liver-tumor-on-a-chip. In addition, the importance of heart⁻liver⁻intestine co-culture with microvasculature in tumor-on-a-chip devices for in vitro chemosensitivity assay will be discussed. Such system would be able to completely evaluate the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) of anticancer drugs and more realistically recapitulate tumor in vivo-like microenvironment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.