Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30406193›Full record

RevieweNeuro

What, If Anything, Is Rodent Prefrontal Cortex?

Mark Laubach, Linda M Amarante, Kyra Swanson, Samantha R White

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 270 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
270citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

270 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 453 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

210 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark LaubachDepartment of Biology and Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016.
Linda M AmaranteDepartment of Biology and Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016.
Kyra SwansonDepartment of Biology and Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016.
Samantha R WhiteDepartment of Biology and Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016.
American University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prefrontal cortex (PFC) means different things to different people. In recent years, there has been a major increase in publications on the PFC, especially using mice. However, inconsistencies in the nomenclature and anatomical boundaries of PFC areas has made it difficult for researchers to compare data and interpret findings across species. We conducted a meta-analysis of publications on the PFC of humans and rodents and found dramatic differences in the focus of research on these species. In addition, we compared anatomical terms and criteria across several common rodent brain atlases and found inconsistencies among, and even within, leading atlases. To assess the impact of these issues on the research community, we conducted a survey of established PFC researchers on their use of anatomical terms and found little consensus. We report on the results of the survey and propose an alternative scheme for interpreting data from rodent studies, based on structural analysis of the corpus callosum and nomenclature used in research on the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) of primates.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAnimalsGyrus CinguliHumansNerve NetPrefrontal CortexPrimatesRodentiaatlascallosumcingulatedmeta-analysisprefrontalsurvey

Identifiers

PMID30406193
PMCPMC6220587
OpenAlexW2896605400

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.