ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2018
Correction to: Copper signalling: causes and consequences.
Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arylphosphonate-Tethered Porphyrins: Fluorescence Silencing Speaks a Metal Language in Living Enterocytes*.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021Article
- Copper toxicity of inflection point in human intestinal cell line Caco-2 dissected: influence of temporal expression patterns.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Table 3. The correct version of Table 3 is shown below:The publishers apologise for this error. The original article [1] has been corrected.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.