Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30423550›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of nephrology2018

Coronary Artery Calcification in Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis.

Thijs T Jansz, Franka E van Reekum, Akin Özyilmaz, Pim A de Jong, Franciscus T J Boereboom, Tiny Hoekstra, Marianne C Verhaar, Brigit C van Jaarsveld

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Deep dive into intravascular coronary imaging in calcified lesions.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Thijs T JanszDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, t.t.jansz@umcutrecht.nl.
Franka E van ReekumDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Akin ÖzyilmazDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pim A de JongDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Franciscus T J BoereboomDianet Dialysis Centers, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tiny HoekstraDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marianne C VerhaarDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Brigit C van JaarsveldDianet Dialysis Centers, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLDianet · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVascular calcification is seen in most patients on dialysis and is strongly associated with cardiovascular mortality. Vascular calcification is promoted by phosphate, which generally reaches higher levels in hemodialysis than in peritoneal dialysis. However, whether vascular calcification develops less in peritoneal dialysis than in hemodialysis is currently unknown. Therefore, we compared coronary artery calcification (CAC), its progression, and calcification biomarkers between patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

methodsWe measured CAC in 134 patients who had been treated exclusively with hemodialysis (n = 94) or peritoneal dialysis (n = 40) and were transplantation candidates. In 57 of them (34 on hemodialysis and 23 on peritoneal dialysis), we also measured CAC progression annually up to 3 years and the inactive species of desphospho-uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein (dp-ucMGP), fetuin-A, osteoprotegerin. We compared CAC cross-sectionally with Tobit regression. CAC progression was compared in 2 ways: with linear mixed models as the difference in square root transformed volume score per year (ΔCAC SQRV) and with Tobit mixed models. We adjusted for potential confounders.

resultsIn the cross-sectional cohort, CAC volume scores were 92 mm3 in hemodialysis and 492 mm3 in peritoneal dialysis (adjusted difference 436 mm3; 95% CI -47 to 919; p = 0.08). In the longitudinal cohort, peritoneal dialysis was associated with significantly more CAC progression defined as ΔCAC SQRV (adjusted difference 1.20; 95% CI 0.09 to 2.31; p = 0.03), but not with Tobit mixed models (adjusted difference in CAC score increase per year 106 mm3; 95% CI -140 to 352; p = 0.40). Peritoneal dialysis was associated with higher osteoprotegerin (adjusted p = 0.02) but not with dp-ucMGP or fetuin-A.

conclusionsPeritoneal dialysis is not associated with less CAC or CAC progression than hemodialysis, and perhaps with even more progression. This indicates that vascular calcification does not develop less in peritoneal dialysis than in hemodialysis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal DialysisProspective StudiesRenal DialysisBiomarkersCoronary artery calcificationHemodialysisPeritoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID30423550
PMCPMC6390451
OpenAlexW2900739798

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.