SynthesisJournal of human hypertension2019
Central-to-brachial blood pressure amplification in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of human hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linking glucose metabolism to arterial stiffness and blood pressure in non-diabetic adults: the mediating role of FGF21.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Invasive validation of the Antares algorithm for determining central blood pressure based on upper arm oscillometric pulse waves in patients with type 2 diabetes.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2023Article
- The impact of β-blockers on the central and delta systolic pressures in a real-world population with treated hypertension: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Prediction of cardiovascular events by central blood pressure using radial tonometry in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.Clinical hypertension · 2022Article
- Ambulatory blood pressure and arterial stiffness web-based telemonitoring in patients at cardiovascular risk. First results of the VASOTENS (Vascular health ASsessment Of The hypertENSive patients) Registry.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to systolic blood pressure (SBP) amplification, brachial SBP may not accurately reflect central SBP, the pressure the organs are exposed to. Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have vascular irregularities that may affect blood pressure (BP) amplification and central BP indices (i.e. augmentation index [AIx] and augmentation pressure [AP]). By systematic review and meta-analysis, this study aimed firstly to determine the magnitude of central-to-brachial SBP and pulse pressure (PP) amplification in T2D compared to healthy controls and secondly, the difference in AIx and AP between the groups. Online databases were searched for published studies reporting invasive or non-invasive central and brachial SBP in T2D and healthy controls up to the 20th of February 2018. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were used to analyze the studies. Eighteen studies (all non-invasive: 17 radial tonometry, 1 carotid tonometry, 2 brachial oscillometry) with a total of 2758 patients with T2D and 10,561 healthy controls were identified. There was no significant difference in SBP amplification between groups (T2D = 9.9 ± 4.7, healthy controls = 9.6 ± 4.5 mmHg, p = 0.84; pooled difference = 0.64 mmHg, 95%CI -0.27 1.54, p = 0.17) or PP amplification ratio (p = 0.16). However, among these studies, central BP indices (AIx corrected for heart rate and AP) were significantly higher in T2D (p < 0.05 for both). Despite a similar magnitude of central-to-brachial SBP amplification, patients with T2D have increased central systolic loading (AIx and AP) that cannot be discerned from brachial BP alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.