Evidence mapPaperPMID 30445718Full record

Trial reportNutrients2018

Associations of Brain Reactivity to Food Cues with Weight Loss, Protein Intake and Dietary Restraint during the PREVIEW Intervention.

Mathijs Drummen, Elke Dorenbos, Anita C E Vreugdenhil, Gareth Stratton, Anne Raben, Margriet S Westerterp-Plantenga, Tanja C Adam

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Editorial: FIN Special Issue on PREVIEW.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mathijs DrummenDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.drummen@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Elke DorenbosNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. elke.dorenbos@mumc.nl.
Anita C E VreugdenhilNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. a.vreugdenhil@mumc.nl.
Gareth StrattonResearch Centre in Applied Sports, Technology Exercise and Medicine, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, SA1 8EN Wales, UK. g.stratton@swansea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5618-0803
Anne RabenDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, DK-1017 Copenhagen, Denmark. ara@nexs.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-5229-4491
Margriet S Westerterp-PlantengaNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.westerterp@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6326-3102
Tanja C AdamDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. t.adam@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NLSwansea University · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Seventh Framework Programme 312057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to assess the effects of a weight loss and subsequent weight maintenance period comprising two diets differing in protein intake, on brain reward reactivity to visual food cues. Brain reward reactivity was assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging in 27 overweight/obese individuals with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance (HOMA-IR: 3.7 ± 1.7; BMI: 31.8 ± 3.2 kg/m²; fasting glucose: 6.4 ± 0.6 mmol/L) before and after an 8-week low energy diet followed by a 2-year weight maintenance period, with either high protein (HP) or medium protein (MP) dietary guidelines. Brain reactivity and possible relationships with protein intake, anthropometrics, insulin resistance and eating behaviour were assessed. Brain reactivity, BMI, HOMA-IR and protein intake did not change differently between the groups during the intervention. In the whole group, protein intake during weight maintenance was negatively related to changes in high calorie images>low calorie images (H > L) brain activation in the superior/middle frontal gyrus and the inferior temporal gyrus (

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnthropometryBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexBrainCaloric RestrictionCuesDietDietary ProteinsDiet, High-ProteinFeeding BehaviorFemaleGlucose IntoleranceHumansInsulin ResistanceBlood GlucoseDietary ProteinsfMRIfood cuesfood rewardinsulin resistanceobesityprotein intakeweight loss

Identifiers

PMID30445718
PMCPMC6266251
OpenAlexW2901970288

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.