SynthesisEndocrine2019
Critical appraisal and systematic review of guidelines for perioperative diabetes management: 2011-2017.
Synthesis in Endocrine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation and management of primary hyperparathyroidism.Endocrine · 2024Pooled it
- Can you trust clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic surgery.Updates in surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Development of insulin and its pharmacology and perioperative use: a narrative review.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Review
- Anti-Hyperglycemic Medication Management in the Perioperative Setting: A Review and Illustrative Case of an Adverse Effect of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Chronic glycemic control influences the relationship between acute perioperative dysglycemia and perioperative outcome.Journal of diabetes · 2024Article
- A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for the management of pain, sedation, delirium and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in pediatric intensive care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Publishing clinical prActice GuidelinEs (PAGE): Recommendations from editors and reviewers.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2022Article
- The structure of the quality of clinical practice guidelines with the items and overall assessment in AGREE II: a regression analysis.BMC health services research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo systematically evaluate the quality, consistency and the evidence support of guidelines for perioperative diabetes management.
methodsWe retrieved guidelines through systematic search, critically evaluated their quality and compared the recommendations of included guidelines. Five aspects were compared: target level, management of hyper- and hypoglycaemia, frequency of monitoring, management of insulin, and management of oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs).
resultsFourteen guidelines met our criteria, and 342 recommendations were extracted, the results of Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) evaluation showed that none of the mean score in each domain was higher than 50%. On average, most guidelines had only one domain scored above 50%. Most recommendations (78.9%) did not specify their supporting evidence, 71 (20.8%) were formed using grading criteria, none cited systematic review or meta-analysis. Recommendations were inconsistent across different guidelines.
conclusionsThe existing guidelines about perioperative management of diabetes needs improvement in methodology, as well as the production of evidence with high quality. Evidence-based guidelines are required for the perioperative management of diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30446970What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.