ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2016
Endotracheal tube cuff pressures and tube position in critically injured patients on arrival at a referral centre: Avoidable harm?
Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid sequence intubation: a survey of current practice in the South African pre-hospital setting.International journal of emergency medicine · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Airway Management Proficiency in Pre-Hospital Emergency Setting; a Simulation Study.Emergency (Tehran, Iran) · 2018Article
- Ventilation in Trauma Patients: The First 24 h is Different!World journal of surgery · 2017Review
- Ujuzi (Practical Pearl/African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe consequences of excessive endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressure are known and have long-term effects; however less attention is placed upon cuff pressure and tube position pre-hospital and in emergency centre. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ETT cuff pressure and tube position on arrival of all patients admitted to the Trauma Unit at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, both from scene and inter-hospital transfers to determine the median cuff-pressure and if there were differences between the two groups.
methodsData from Trauma Unit patients are entered into a prospective; UKZN approved (BE207-09) Trauma Database. Data on 65 admissions between April and December 2014 were reviewed to determine the arrival cuff pressure and tube position. Data captured included patient age, cuff pressure, where and who intubated the patient, and time since intubation to cuff pressure check. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and Student's
resultsMost patients had sustained motor vehicle related trauma, with a male predominance. Equal numbers were intubated pre-hospital versus the in-hospital group. Eighty percent of ETT's were placed in the correct anatomical location, however only 23% of cuff pressures were found to be within the safe pressure limits. ETT cuff pressures were excessive in the pre-hospital ALS group more often than the facility-intubation group (
conclusionMost patients, whether intubated on-scene or at hospital have ETT cuff pressures that are excessive, with the potential for ischaemic necrosis of the tracheal mucosa. ETT cuff manometry should be standard of care for all prehospital and in-hospital intubations where the tube will remain in situ for any prolonged period of time. Before inter-facility transfer ETT position should be confirmed radiologically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.