Evidence mapPaperPMID 30456728Full record

SynthesisActa diabetologica2019

Cardiovascular and mortality events in type 2 diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trials: a systematic review with trend analysis.

Lorenzo M Vetrone, Francesco Zaccardi, David R Webb, Sam Seidu, Nitin N Gholap, Dario Pitocco, Melanie J Davies, Kamlesh Khunti

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta diabetologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diabetes: A Subspecialty of Medicine and a Matter of Public Health.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain: A Systematic Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lorenzo M VetroneDiabetes Research Centre, Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Rd, Leicester, LE5 4PW, England, UK.
Francesco ZaccardiDiabetes Research Centre, Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Rd, Leicester, LE5 4PW, England, UK. frazac@fastwebnet.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2636-6487
David R WebbDiabetes Research Centre, Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Rd, Leicester, LE5 4PW, England, UK.
Sam SeiduDiabetes Research Centre, Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Rd, Leicester, LE5 4PW, England, UK.
Nitin N GholapUniversity Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry, CV2 2DX, England, UK.
Dario PitoccoServizio di Diabetologia, Catholic University School of Medicine, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00198, Rome, Italy.
Melanie J DaviesDiabetes Research Centre, Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Rd, Leicester, LE5 4PW, England, UK.
Kamlesh KhuntiDiabetes Research Centre, Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Rd, Leicester, LE5 4PW, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate cardiovascular disease and mortality trends in control arm participants of diabetes cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs).

methodsWe electronically searched CVOTs published before October 2017. Data on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and events, and baseline characteristics were collected, along with study calendar years. Trends were estimated using negative binomial regressions and reported as rate ratio (RR) per 5-year intervals.

results26 CVOTs, conducted from 1961 to 2015, included 86788 participants with 6543 all-cause deaths, 3265 cardiovascular deaths, and 7657 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3-P MACE; combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke). In unadjusted analysis, there was an increasing trend for 3-P MACE rates over time (5-year RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.34, 1.84); a small increasing trend for cardiovascular disease mortality rates (1.13; 1.01, 1.26); and stable rates for all-cause death. Adjusting for age, sex, previous myocardial infarction, and diabetes duration, there was no evidence of trends for 3-P MACE or cardiovascular disease mortality rates, while reducing rates were observed for nonfatal myocardial infarction (5-year RR: 0.72; 0.54, 0.96), total stroke (0.76; 0.66, 0.88), and nonfatal stroke (0.60; 0.43, 0.82).

conclusionsIn contrast to real-world data, there was no evidence of an improvement in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes participants included in control arms of randomised clinical trials across 5 decades. Further studies should investigate whether and how dissimilarities in populations, procedures, and assessments of exposures and outcomes explain the differences between real-world setting and clinical trials.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesFemaleHumansMaleMortalityPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeCardiovascularMortalityRandomised trialsSystematic reviewTrendType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30456728
PMCPMC6394717

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.