ArticleAmerican health & drug benefits2018
Estimating the Real-World Cost of Diabetes Mellitus in the United States During an 8-Year Period Using 2 Cost Methodologies.
Article in American health & drug benefits, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The reliability of using gingival crevicular blood to measure blood glucose and hba1c levels in the dental setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Pooled it
- Trajectory of Kidney Function in T1D over Time: A Scoping Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Review
- Salivary Glucose Testing for Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence and Methodological Heterogeneity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Psycho-social and behavioral trends in Type 2 Diabetes self-management amongst medically underserved patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in an mHealth intervention.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Effect of comorbidities on healthcare expenditures for patients on kidney replacement therapy considering the treatment modality and duration in a French cohort.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Article
- Association between different insulin resistance indices and all-cause mortality in patients with diabetic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Descriptive study of the economic burden among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus in a large US commercially insured population.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023Observational
- Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Antidiabetic Drugs: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Real-World Patients.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Promoting Pro-Endocrine Differentiation and Graft Maturation Following Surgical Resection of the Mouse Pancreas.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- The Endothelium as a Therapeutic Target in Diabetes: A Narrative Review and Perspective.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Healthcare resource utilization and cost among patients with type 1 diabetes in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Observational
- Cost-effectiveness of long-acting insulin analogues vs intermediate/long-acting human insulin for type 1 diabetes: A population-based cohort followed over 10 years.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Estimation of Annual Health Care Costs for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Article
- Microbiota in pancreatic health and disease: the next frontier in microbiome research.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020Review
- Real-world Comorbidity Burden, Health Care Utilization, and Costs of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Patients With Advanced Liver Diseases.Journal of clinical gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes is associated with substantial clinical and economic burdens on patients and on the US healthcare system. Treatment options for patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes have increased significantly, from only 3 drug classes in 1995 to more than 12 distinct classes today. Although several of the newer treatments are reported to have improved efficacy and safety profiles, they are often substantially more costly than older medications. Consequently, as drug options increase, the cost of diabetes management continues to grow.
objectivesTo estimate the annual real-world costs of type 1 and 2 diabetes, as well as diabetes prevalence, treatment patterns, care quality, and resource utilization during 8 years.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we examined 8 annual cohorts of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, on a biennial basis, using claims data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database between 2006 and 2014. Patients were matched with controls by age, sex, residency, and health plan type. We assessed the prevalence of diabetes, treatment patterns, care quality measures, and all-cause and diabetes-related healthcare costs using 2 methods. Method 1 calculated the annual costs as the difference in all-cause costs between patients with diabetes and matched controls. Method 2 calculated the costs for healthcare encounters based on specific codes for a diabetes diagnosis or for antidiabetes medications.
resultsBetween 346,486 and 410,234 patients with type 2 diabetes and between 21,176 and 26,228 patients with type 1 diabetes were included in each study year cohort. Between 2007 and 2014, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes increased from 4.9% to 6.3%. The costs associated with using Method 1 were almost double the cost estimates in Method 2 during most of the study period. For patients with type 1 diabetes, the associated costs were twice greater with Method 1 than with Method 2. Projections to the entire US population in 2014 indicated a total of 19.3 million individuals with diabetes and associated direct costs of $314.8 billion that year.
conclusionCost estimates can guide the prioritization of healthcare expenditures. The results of this study showed that costs attributable to diabetes differed by approximately 2-fold, depending on the estimation method. The management of the escalating expenses for diabetes management in the United States requires judicious selection of the methods for estimating costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30464797PMC6207315What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.