Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30470985›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2019

Dexamethasone implant as an adjuvant therapy to ranibizumab loading dose in persistent diabetic macular edema.

Akin Cakir, Burak Erden, Selim Bolukbasi, Alper Halil Bayat, Seyma Gulcenur Ozturan, Mustafa Nuri Elcioglu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akin CakirDepartment of Opthalmology, Okmeydanı Research and Training Hospital, Darülaceze Cad. No:25 Şişli, 34367, Istanbul, Turkey. dracakir@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5880-283X
Burak ErdenDepartment of Opthalmology, Okmeydanı Research and Training Hospital, Darülaceze Cad. No:25 Şişli, 34367, Istanbul, Turkey.
Selim BolukbasiDepartment of Opthalmology, Okmeydanı Research and Training Hospital, Darülaceze Cad. No:25 Şişli, 34367, Istanbul, Turkey.
Alper Halil BayatDepartment of Opthalmology, Okmeydanı Research and Training Hospital, Darülaceze Cad. No:25 Şişli, 34367, Istanbul, Turkey.
Seyma Gulcenur OzturanDepartment of Opthalmology, Okmeydanı Research and Training Hospital, Darülaceze Cad. No:25 Şişli, 34367, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mustafa Nuri ElciogluDepartment of Opthalmology, Okmeydanı Research and Training Hospital, Darülaceze Cad. No:25 Şişli, 34367, Istanbul, Turkey.
Okmeydanı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study evaluates the effectiveness of a single-dose dexamethasone implant (DI) as an auxiliary therapy to continued intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) treatment in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME).

methodsTwenty-five pseudophakic eyes of 25 patients with DME who underwent a single injection of DI as an adjuvant therapy following an IVR loading dose were examined retrospectively. All patients were treatment naive and had a poor response to a loading dose of three consecutive monthly IVR injections. IVR treatments were continued pro re nata after the DI. The main outcome measures were changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) at 1, 3, 6 and 8 months post-DI treatment.

resultsAfter the IVR loading dose, the mean BCVA and CMT were 0.9 ± 0.6 LogMAR and 478.2 ± 107.8 µm, respectively. One month after the DI, the mean BCVA and CMT had improved to 0.6 ± 0.4 LogMAR (p = 0.005) and 313.8 ± 62.7 µm (p < 0.001), respectively. This improvement was maintained with mean 0.8 ± 0.8 IVR injections throughout the follow-up period. The final mean BCVA and CMT were 0.5 ± 0.5 LogMAR and 298.4 ± 71.5 µm. Subgroup analyses revealed that different DME types did not have any effect on CMT or BCVA improvement (p = 0.188, p = 0.136; respectively).

conclusionAdding DI results in rapid anatomical and visual improvement in patients who respond poorly to an IVR loading dose. Improvements may be maintained with additional IVR in follow-up.

Indexed as

Drug ImplantsAgedAnalysis of VarianceAngiogenesis InhibitorsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDexamethasoneDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedRanibizumabRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoidsRanibizumabAdjuvant therapyDexamethasoneDiabetic macular edema

Identifiers

PMID30470985
OpenAlexW2900695924

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.