Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30471129›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

Learning-based CBCT correction using alternating random forest based on auto-context model.

Yang Lei, Xiangyang Tang, Kristin Higgins, Jolinta Lin, Jiwoong Jeong, Tian Liu, Anees Dhabaan, Tonghe Wang, Xue Dong, Robert Press and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Radiation Oncology-Biology Integration Network: Bridging the Gap between Biological Research and Clinical Practice.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  2. PE-CycleGAN network based CBCT-sCT generation for nasopharyngeal carsinoma adaptive radiotherapy.Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Deep learning-based thoracic CBCT correction with histogram matching.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2021
    Article
  11. Knowledge-based radiation treatment planning: A data-driven method survey.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. A review of deep learning based methods for medical image multi-organ segmentation.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Deep learning in medical image registration: a review.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Machine learning in quantitative PET: A review of attenuation correction and low-count image reconstruction methods.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yang LeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Xiangyang TangDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Kristin HigginsDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Jolinta LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Jiwoong JeongDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Tian LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Anees DhabaanDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Tonghe WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Xue DongDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Robert PressDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Walter J CurranDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Xiaofeng YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Funding

Multiparametric MRI-guided Prostate HDR Brachytherapy with Focal Tumor BoostR01CA215718 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, XIAOFENG · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Department of Defense W81XWH-13-1-0269NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215718NCI NIH HHS R01CA215718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeQuantitative Cone Beam CT (CBCT) imaging is increasing in demand for precise image-guided radiotherapy because it provides a foundation for advanced image-guided techniques, including accurate treatment setup, online tumor delineation, and patient dose calculation. However, CBCT is currently limited only to patient setup in the clinic because of the severe issues in its image quality. In this study, we develop a learning-based approach to improve CBCT's image quality for extended clinical applications. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn auto-context model is integrated into a machine learning framework to iteratively generate corrected CBCT (CCBCT) with high-image quality. The first step is data preprocessing for the built training dataset, in which uninformative image regions are removed, noise is reduced, and CT and CBCT images are aligned. After a CBCT image is divided into a set of patches, the most informative and salient anatomical features are extracted to train random forests. Within each patch, alternating RF is applied to create a CCBCT patch as the output. Moreover, an iterative refinement strategy is exercised to enhance the image quality of CCBCT. Then, all the CCBCT patches are integrated to reconstruct final CCBCT images.

resultsThe learning-based CBCT correction algorithm was evaluated using the leave-one-out cross-validation method applied on a cohort of 12 patients' brain data and 14 patients' pelvis data. The mean absolute error (MAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), normalized cross-correlation (NCC) indexes, and spatial nonuniformity (SNU) in the selected regions of interest (ROIs) were used to quantify the proposed algorithm's correction accuracy and generat the following results: mean MAE = 12.81 ± 2.04 and 19.94 ± 5.44 HU, mean PSNR = 40.22 ± 3.70 and 31.31 ± 2.85 dB, mean NCC = 0.98 ± 0.02 and 0.95 ± 0.01, and SNU = 2.07 ± 3.36% and 2.07 ± 3.36% for brain and pelvis data.

conclusionPreliminary results demonstrated that the novel learning-based correction method can significantly improve CBCT image quality. Hence, the proposed algorithm is of great potential in improving CBCT's image quality to support its clinical utility in CBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyMachine LearningArtifactsBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPelvisRadiation Dosageadaptive radiotherapyalternating random forestCBCT correctionfeature selection

Identifiers

PMID30471129
PMCPMC7792987

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.