ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2020
Cancer-specific expression quantitative loci are affected by expression dysregulation.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determinants of gastric cancer immune escape identified from non-coding immune-landscape quantitative trait loci.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Epigenome-augmented eQTL-hotspots reveal genome-wide transcriptional programs in 36 human tissues.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Modeling the relationship between gene expression and mutational signature.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2023Article
- GTQC: Automated Genotyping Array Quality Control and Report.Journal of genomics · 2022Article
- Advancing Pan-cancer Gene Expression Survial Analysis by Inclusion of Non-coding RNA.RNA biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) have been touted as the missing piece that can bridge the gap between genetic variants and phenotypes. Over the past decade, we have witnessed a sharp rise of effort in the identification and application of eQTLs. The successful application of eQTLs relies heavily on their reproducibility. The current eQTL databases such as Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) were populated primarily with eQTLs deriving from germline single nucleotide polymorphisms and normal tissue gene expression. The novel scenarios that employ eQTL models for prediction purposes often involve disease phenotypes characterized by altered gene expressions. To evaluate eQTL reproducibility across diverse data sources and the effect of disease-specific gene expression alteration on eQTL identification, we conducted an eQTL study using 5178 samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We found that the reproducibility of eQTLs between normal and tumor tissues was low in terms of the number of shared eQTLs. However, among the shared eQTLs, the effect directions were generally concordant. This suggests that the source of the gene expression (normal or tumor tissue) has a strong effect on the detectable eQTLs and the effect direction of the eQTLs. Additional analyses demonstrated good directional concordance of eQTLs between GTEx and TCGA. Furthermore, we found that multi-tissue eQTLs may exert opposite effects across multiple tissue types. In summary, our results suggest that eQTL prediction models need to carefully address tissue and disease dependency of eQTLs. Tissue-disease-specific eQTL databases can afford more accurate prediction models for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.