Evidence mapPaperPMID 30489140Full record

Trial reportPsychiatric rehabilitation journal2019

A pilot study comparing peer supported web-based CBT to self-managed web CBT for primary care veterans with PTSD and hazardous alcohol use.

Kyle Possemato, Emily M Johnson, J Bronte Emery, Michael Wade, Michelle C Acosta, Lisa A Marsch, Andrew Rosenblum, Stephen A Maisto

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatric rehabilitation journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Peer support during in vivo exposure homework increases likelihood of prolonged exposure therapy completion.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Peer Support Activities for Veterans, Serving Members, and Their Families: Results of a Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  19. Differences in quality-of-life scores across injury categories by mental health status among injured U.S. military service members and veterans.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kyle PossematoVeterans Affairs Center for Integrated Healthcare.
Emily M JohnsonVeterans Affairs Center for Integrated Healthcare.
J Bronte EmeryVeterans Affairs Center for Integrated Healthcare.
Michael WadeVeterans Affairs Center for Integrated Healthcare.
Michelle C AcostaNational Development Research Institutes.
Lisa A MarschDartmouth College.ORCID 0000-0001-6429-0965
Andrew RosenblumNational Development Research Institutes.
Stephen A MaistoNational Development Research Institutes.
Department of Veterans Affairs · AUNational Development and Research Institutes · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · 2025 to 2025
$1.4M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020181NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926NIH HHSVeterans Affairs Center for Integrated Healthcare
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMany combat veterans struggle with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and hazardous alcohol use and are hesitant to engage in behavioral health services. Combining peer support with an eHealth intervention may overcome many barriers to care. This pilot study investigated the feasibility of adding peer support to a web-based cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) targeting PTSD symptoms and hazardous drinking, called Thinking Forward.

methodThirty primary care patients with PTSD and hazardous alcohol use were randomized to receive Thinking Forward with or without peer support. Participants were assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 24-week follow-up. Feasibility was analyzed with descriptive statistics. Preliminary outcomes were analyzed with multilevel modeling and effect sizes are presented.

resultsPeer support specialists can be feasibly trained to support the Thinking Forward intervention with good fidelity. Both participants and peers reported good satisfaction with the protocol; although peers discussed a mismatch between the philosophies of peer support and diagnostically focused CBT. All participants experienced significant improvements in PTSD, quality of life, resiliency, and coping from pre- to posttreatment, with no differences between conditions. Pretreatment patient activation predicted outcomes regardless of whether participants received peer support. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Peer support interventions to facilitate eHealth programs should strive to be consistent with the person-centered, recovery orientation of peer support, explicitly focus on patient activation, and consider characteristics of the patients, such as their level of problem recognition and willingness to engage in traditional behavioral health modalities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPeer GroupSocial SupportVeteransAdultAlcoholismCognitive Behavioral TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareProcess Assessment, Health CareSelf-Management

Identifiers

PMID30489140
PMCPMC6541543
OpenAlexW2903365971

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.