Trial reportBMC public health2018
Attendance barriers experienced by female health care workers voluntarily participating in a multi-component health promotion programme at the workplace.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02843269 (Multiple-component Workplace FRamed Intervention to Decrease Occupational Muscle Pain - FRIDOM. Background, Design and Conceptual Model of a Cluster Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Study Among Female Health Care Workers), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multiple-component Workplace FRamed Intervention to Decrease Occupational Muscle Pain - FRIDOM. Background, Design and Conceptual Model of a Cluster Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Study Among Female Health Care Workers
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acceptability of Suubi+Adherence intervention to improve ART adherence in Southern Uganda: A qualitative analysis.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Videoconference-Supervised Group Exercise Reduces Low Back Pain in Eldercare Workers: Results from the ReViEEW Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Testing the Pragmatic Effectiveness of a Consumer-Based Mindfulness Mobile App in the Workplace: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Trial
- Digital health for cancer prevention: implications for current and future traditional in-person programs.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Effects of Exercise During Working Hours in Acute Hospital Staff - A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Exploring drivers of women's well-being in hospitals: mapping the landscape.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Implementation of Intelligent Physical Exercise Training at a Danish Hospital-A Qualitative Study of Employees' Barriers and Facilitators for Participation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions to Improve Health and Well-Being of Health and Social Service Workers: A Narrative Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Exercise Prescription for the Work-Life Population and Beyond.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023Review
- Work Ability and Well-Being Management and Its Barriers and Facilitators in Multinational Organizations: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Translational researchers' training and development needs, preferences, and barriers: A survey in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre in the United Kingdom.Clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Health Promotion for Outpatient Careworkers in Germany.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effectiveness and response differences of a multidisciplinary workplace health promotion program for healthcare workers.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Managers attitude towards implementing workplace health promotion programmes to employees in eldercare: a cross-sectional study.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Fear-avoidance beliefs are associated with exercise adherence: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) among female healthcare workers with recurrent low back pain.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies have shown that Workplace Health Promoting Programmes (WHPP) can facilitate healthier behaviour. Despite the benefits achieved from participating in a WHPP, a systematic review showed that only 10-50% of the employees participated and a challenge was lack of participation. Previous studies stress that understanding the barriers that prevent participants from attending WHPPs are important for designing highly effective interventions. To exploit the potential of a WHPP, it requires a deep insight into the attendance barriers experienced by the participants who voluntarily sign-up for a WHPP; and particularly those who want to stay in the programme but are prevented from participating in it regularly. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify and explore attendance barriers experienced by female Health Care Workers (HCWs) who voluntarily participated in a weekly one-hour multi-component training session, within a WHPP, over a one-year period.
methodsThis study was carried out within a RCT named FRIDOM (FRamed Intervention to Decrease Occupational Muscle pain) and was designed as a single-case study with an inductive approach for analysing the content of in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews. Data was collected at two home care workplaces and two retirement homes in Denmark. Nine HCWs from the intervention group were selected as participants in the present study.
resultsThe attendance barriers identified, consisted of three main themes and six related sub-themes: 1) organizational factors (work inflexibility, lack of support from team leaders), 2) intervention factors (training sessions organized outside normal work hours, incongruence between information received and reality, content and intensity of the program) and 3) individual factors (personal factors).
conclusionOrganizational and intervention factors are the two most important attendance barriers in future WHPPs. To overcome these barriers; training sessions should be organized within or in connection with work hours, support should be secured from team management and work shifts should be planned to enable attendance for all participants. Furthermore, the attendance barriers may be minimized by including participants in the decision-making process. This relates to both the content and intensity of the intervention, not only in the planning stage but throughout the intervention process.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02843269 - 06.27.2016 - retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.