Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30529598›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2019

Biomarkers in Lung Cancer Screening: Achievements, Promises, and Challenges.

Luis M Seijo, Nir Peled, Daniel Ajona, Mattia Boeri, John K Field, Gabriella Sozzi, Ruben Pio, Javier J Zulueta, Avrum Spira, Pierre P Massion and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 291 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
291citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
26.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

291 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 562 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Guideline
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Over- and underscreening for lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

231 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Luis M SeijoClinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain; CIBERES, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain.
Nir PeledOncology Division, The Legacy Heritage Oncology Center and Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center and Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Daniel AjonaSolid Tumors Program, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Pamplona, Spain; Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERONC, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain; Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Mattia BoeriDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
John K FieldThe Roy Castle Lung Cancer Research Programme, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Gabriella SozziDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Ruben PioSolid Tumors Program, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Pamplona, Spain; Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERONC, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain; Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Javier J ZuluetaDepartment of Pulmonology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Visiongate Inc., Phoenix, Arizona.
Avrum SpiraBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pierre P MassionVanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Peter J MazzoneRespiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Luis M MontuengaSolid Tumors Program, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Pamplona, Spain; Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERONC, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. Electronic address: lmontuenga@unav.es.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer · ESFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITBoston University · USCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESCleveland Clinic · USClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESSoroka Medical Center · ILUniversity of Liverpool · GBVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Validation of Biomarkers of Risk for the Early Detection of Lung CancerU01CA152662 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEPPEN, STEPHEN, GROGAN, ERIC L · 2010 to 2025
$12.8M
Identifying non-coding RNAs for early detection and prevention of lung cancerU01CA166905 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CROCE, CARLO M, PASS, HARVEY IRA · 2013 to 2017
$4.5M
Department of Health 09/61/501NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152662NCI NIH HHS U01 CA166905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review is an update of the research and development efforts regarding the use of molecular biomarkers in the lung cancer screening setting. The two main unmet clinical needs, namely, the refinement of risk to improve the selection of individuals undergoing screening and the characterization of undetermined nodules found during the computed tomography-based screening process are the object of the biomarkers described in the present review. We first propose some principles to optimize lung cancer biomarker discovery projects. Then, we summarize the discovery and developmental status of currently promising molecular candidates, such as autoantibodies, complement fragments, microRNAs, circulating tumor DNA, DNA methylation, blood protein profiling, or RNA airway or nasal signatures. We also mention other emerging biomarkers or new technologies to follow, such as exhaled breath biomarkers, metabolomics, sputum cell imaging, genetic predisposition studies, and the integration of next-generation sequencing into study of circulating DNA. We also underline the importance of integrating different molecular technologies together with imaging, radiomics, and artificial intelligence. We list a number of completed, ongoing, or planned trials to show the clinical utility of molecular biomarkers. Finally, we comment on future research challenges in the field of biomarkers in the context of lung cancer screening and propose a design of a trial to test the clinical utility of one or several candidate biomarkers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerHumansLung NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersClinical utilityLung cancerScreeningTest validationTrial design

Identifiers

PMID30529598
PMCPMC6494979
OpenAlexW2903411538

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.