ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2019
Personalized Models for Injected Activity Levels in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observer studies of image quality of denoising reduced-count cardiac single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging by three-dimensional Gaussian post-reconstruction filtering and deep learning.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- First validation of stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using a novel reconstruction process.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- An Algorithm for Individual Dosage in Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride SPECT-Gated Radionuclide Angiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Low-Dose SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Convolutional Denoising Networks.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a patient-specific ("personalized") approach for tailoring the injected activities to individual patients in order to achieve dose reduction in SPECT-myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). First, we develop a strategy to determine the minimum dose levels required for each patient in a large set of clinical acquisitions (857 subjects) such that the reconstructed images are sufficiently similar to that obtained at conventional clinical dose. We then apply machine learning models to predict the required dose levels on an individual basis based on a set of patient attributes which include body measurements and various clinical variables. We demonstrate the personalized dose models for two commonly used reconstruction methods in clinical SPECT-MPI: 1) conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) with post-filtering and 2) ordered-subsets expectation-maximization (OS-EM) with corrections for attenuation, scatter and resolution, and evaluate their performance in perfusion-defect detection by using the clinical Quantitative Perfusion SPECT software package. The results indicate that the achieved dose reduction can vary greatly among individuals from their conventional clinical dose and that the personalized dose models can achieve further reduction on average compared with a global (non-patient specific) dose reduction approach. In particular, the average personalized dose level can be reduced to 58% and 54% of the full clinical dose, respectively, for FBP and OS-EM reconstruction, while without deteriorating the accuracy in perfusion-defect detection. Furthermore, with the average personalized dose further reduced to only 16% of full dose, OS-EM can still achieve a detection accuracy level comparable to that of FBP with full dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.