Evidence mapPaperPMID 30580575Full record

ReviewArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology2019

Statin Safety and Associated Adverse Events: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Connie B Newman, David Preiss, Jonathan A Tobert, Terry A Jacobson, Robert L Page, Larry B Goldstein, Clifford Chin, Lisa R Tannock, Michael Miller, Geetha Raghuveer and 6 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04826354 (Effects of High-dose StAtin Versus Low-dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe on Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms & on Reaching Target LDL-C Levels Among Elderly Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 336 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
336citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
80.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04826354 phase4completedstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of High-dose StAtin Versus Low-dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe on Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms & on Reaching Target LDL-C Levels Among Elderly Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Ran2021Enrolled582Registered outcomes11Posted comparisons0ConditionsAtheroscleroses, CoronaryArmsRosuvastatin, rosuvastatin and ezetimibe
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

336 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 685 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Associations of different types of statins with the risk of open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

276 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Connie B Newman
David Preiss
Jonathan A Tobert
Terry A Jacobson
Robert L Page
Larry B Goldstein
Clifford Chin
Lisa R Tannock
Michael Miller
Geetha Raghuveer
P Barton Duell
Eliot A Brinton
Amy Pollak
Lynne T Braun
Francine K Welty
American Heart Association Clinical Lipidology, Lipoprotein, Metabolism and Thrombosis Committee, a Joint Committee of the Council on Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology and Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Clinical Cardiology; and Stroke Council
B. Braun (Netherlands) · NLClifford Chance · GBGeorge Eliot Hospital · GBJacobs (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One in 4 Americans >40 years of age takes a statin to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other complications of atherosclerotic disease. The most effective statins produce a mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 55% to 60% at the maximum dosage, and 6 of the 7 marketed statins are available in generic form, which makes them affordable for most patients. Primarily using data from randomized controlled trials, supplemented with observational data where necessary, this scientific statement provides a comprehensive review of statin safety and tolerability. The review covers the general patient population, as well as demographic subgroups, including the elderly, children, pregnant women, East Asians, and patients with specific conditions such as chronic disease of the kidney and liver, human immunodeficiency viral infection, and organ transplants. The risk of statin-induced serious muscle injury, including rhabdomyolysis, is <0.1%, and the risk of serious hepatotoxicity is ≈0.001%. The risk of statin-induced newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus is ≈0.2% per year of treatment, depending on the underlying risk of diabetes mellitus in the population studied. In patients with cerebrovascular disease, statins possibly increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke; however, they clearly produce a greater reduction in the risk of atherothrombotic stroke and thus total stroke, as well as other cardiovascular events. There is no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between statins and cancer, cataracts, cognitive dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, or tendonitis. In US clinical practices, roughly 10% of patients stop taking a statin because of subjective complaints, most commonly muscle symptoms without raised creatine kinase. In contrast, in randomized clinical trials, the difference in the incidence of muscle symptoms without significantly raised creatinine kinase in statin-treated compared with placebo-treated participants is <1%, and it is even smaller (0.1%) for patients who discontinued treatment because of such muscle symptoms. This suggests that muscle symptoms are usually not caused by pharmacological effects of the statin. Restarting statin therapy in these patients can be challenging, but it is important, especially in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events, for whom prevention of these events is a priority. Overall, in patients for whom statin treatment is recommended by current guidelines, the benefits greatly outweigh the risks.

Indexed as

American Heart AssociationCerebral HemorrhageDiabetes MellitusDrug InteractionsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsKidneyLiverMuscular DiseasesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRhabdomyolysisUnited StatesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAHA Scientific Statementscognitive functiondiabetesdrug interactionserectile dysfunctionhemorrhagic strokemusclenocebostatin intolerancestatin safety

Identifiers

PMID30580575
OpenAlexW2905331745

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.