ReviewArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology2019
Statin Safety and Associated Adverse Events: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
Review in Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04826354 (Effects of High-dose StAtin Versus Low-dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe on Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms & on Reaching Target LDL-C Levels Among Elderly Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 336 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of High-dose StAtin Versus Low-dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe on Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms & on Reaching Target LDL-C Levels Among Elderly Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Who cites it
336 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 685 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sources of Heterogeneity in the Efficacy of Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review with Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis of Within-Study Subgroup Differences.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Assessment of adverse effects attributed to statin therapy in product labels: a meta-analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials.Lancet (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Global insights into pediatric ischemic stroke: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in statin adverse reactions and the potential mechanisms: A systematic review.Journal of advanced research · 2025Pooled it
- Cardioprotective Chinese herbs and antiretroviral drug metabolism: a systematic review of in vitro evidence.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Associations of different types of statins with the risk of open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Pooled it
- Statin Use and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery · 2025Pooled it
- Alliaceae versus Brassicaceae for Dyslipidemia: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies.Phytotherapy research : PTR · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative Muscle Tolerability of Different Types and Intensities of Statins: A Network Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2024Pooled it
- The Effect of Statins on the Incidence and Prognosis of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Pooled it
- Statin intolerance management: a systematic review.Endocrine · 2023Pooled it
- Pitavastatin effects on lipids in relation to major adverse cardiovascular events: a REPRIEVE secondary analysis.The lancet. HIV · 2026 · on this mapTrial
- SHR-1918, A Monoclonal Antibody Against Angiopoietin-Like 3, in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Trial
- Statin use and survival in CLL/SLL treated with ibrutinib: pooled analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials.Blood advances · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Causal association between statin use and erectile dysfunction: a 2-sample Mendelian randomization study.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Atorvastatin-Associated Severe Bradyarrhythmia Following Multiorgan Dysfunction: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Suboptimal Achievement of Guideline-Recommended LDL-C Targets in Older Patients Undergoing Comprehensive Geriatric Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Statin-Related Myotoxicity: A Narrative Review and Practical Approach for General Internists.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Review
276 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One in 4 Americans >40 years of age takes a statin to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other complications of atherosclerotic disease. The most effective statins produce a mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 55% to 60% at the maximum dosage, and 6 of the 7 marketed statins are available in generic form, which makes them affordable for most patients. Primarily using data from randomized controlled trials, supplemented with observational data where necessary, this scientific statement provides a comprehensive review of statin safety and tolerability. The review covers the general patient population, as well as demographic subgroups, including the elderly, children, pregnant women, East Asians, and patients with specific conditions such as chronic disease of the kidney and liver, human immunodeficiency viral infection, and organ transplants. The risk of statin-induced serious muscle injury, including rhabdomyolysis, is <0.1%, and the risk of serious hepatotoxicity is ≈0.001%. The risk of statin-induced newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus is ≈0.2% per year of treatment, depending on the underlying risk of diabetes mellitus in the population studied. In patients with cerebrovascular disease, statins possibly increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke; however, they clearly produce a greater reduction in the risk of atherothrombotic stroke and thus total stroke, as well as other cardiovascular events. There is no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between statins and cancer, cataracts, cognitive dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, or tendonitis. In US clinical practices, roughly 10% of patients stop taking a statin because of subjective complaints, most commonly muscle symptoms without raised creatine kinase. In contrast, in randomized clinical trials, the difference in the incidence of muscle symptoms without significantly raised creatinine kinase in statin-treated compared with placebo-treated participants is <1%, and it is even smaller (0.1%) for patients who discontinued treatment because of such muscle symptoms. This suggests that muscle symptoms are usually not caused by pharmacological effects of the statin. Restarting statin therapy in these patients can be challenging, but it is important, especially in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events, for whom prevention of these events is a priority. Overall, in patients for whom statin treatment is recommended by current guidelines, the benefits greatly outweigh the risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.