Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30581192›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2019

The role of sex in the genomics of human complex traits.

Ekaterina A Khramtsova, Lea K Davis, Barbara E Stranger

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 185 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ekaterina A KhramtsovaSection of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-454X
Lea K DavisDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. lea.k.davis@vanderbilt.edu.
Barbara E StrangerSection of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. bstranger@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9021-7331

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly all human complex traits and disease phenotypes exhibit some degree of sex differences, including differences in prevalence, age of onset, severity or disease progression. Until recently, the underlying genetic mechanisms of such sex differences have been largely unexplored. Advances in genomic technologies and analytical approaches are now enabling a deeper investigation into the effect of sex on human health traits. In this Review, we discuss recent insights into the genetic models and mechanisms that lead to sex differences in complex traits. This knowledge is critical for developing deeper insight into the fundamental biology of sex differences and disease processes, thus facilitating precision medicine.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritanceSex CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMalePrecision Medicine

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.