Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30582178›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics2019

Comparison of efficacy and safety between febuxostat and allopurinol in early post-renal transplant recipients with new onset of hyperuricemia.

Xiaoju Shen, Jingjie Li, Qian Fu, Longshan Liu, Xiang Gao, Xiao Chen, Pan Chen, Changxi Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoju ShenDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jingjie LiCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Qian FuOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Longshan LiuOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiang GaoDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Pan ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Changxi WangOrgan Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNSixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81503156National Natural Science Foundation of China 81601347Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2014A030310096Public Welfare Research and Capacity Building Fund of Guangdong 2016A020218006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND

objectiveFebuxostat and allopurinol are xanthine oxidase inhibitors for urate-lowering therapy. The efficacy and safety of febuxostat and allopurinol have been mostly reported in hyperuricemia patients with normal renal function. Here, we aimed to compare the effects of these two drugs in early post-renal transplant recipients, focusing on evaluating the urate-lowering effect and recovery of allograft renal function.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed in early post-renal transplant recipients with new onset of hyperuricemia receiving febuxostat or allopurinol therapy. Serum uric acid (UA) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were detected on days 3, 7 and 15 and months 1, 3 and 6 after therapy initiation. Liver and blood functions were monitored and other adverse events were recorded. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 48 and 33 patients were enrolled in the febuxostat and allopurinol groups, respectively. Significant UA-lowering effects were observed on day 3 in both groups. Febuxostat caused a more rapid UA decline, starting on day 3 and lasting for 1 month. The most apparent contrast was found in UA level (267.25 ± 93.66 vs 334.18 ± 96.56 μmol/L, P = 0.003) on day 7; 62.5% and 30.3% of patients achieved target UA level in febuxostat and allopurinol groups respectively on day 3 (P = 0.004), but there was no significant difference between two groups from days 15 to months 6. The median times to achieve target UA level were 3 and 5 days in febuxostat and allopurinol groups respectively (P = 0.002). The eGFR levels and recovering rates were gradually upregulated but no significant differences were found between two groups. No abnormities related to febuxostat or allopurinol were observed. WHAT IS NEW AND

conclusionThis is the first comprehensive evaluation of UA-lowering effects of febuxostat and allopurinol in early post-renal transplant recipients. Febuxostat caused a marginally quicker serum UA-lowering effect than allopurinol, but there was no advantage for long-term use of febuxostat. The drugs had no significant differences in impacting renal allograft function recovery, and both were well tolerated.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAdolescentAdultAllopurinolCohort StudiesFebuxostatFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateGout SuppressantsHumansHyperuricemiaMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTransplant RecipientsAllopurinolFebuxostatGout SuppressantsUric Acidallopurinolefficacyfebuxostathyperuricemiarenal allograft functionrenal transplantationsafety

Identifiers

PMID30582178
PMCPMC7379739
OpenAlexW2906158255

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.