Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30612549›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2019

Why people engage in a weight loss intervention at their workplace - a stratified case study.

Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen, Majda Pajevic, Pia Maria Ilvig, Karen Søgaard, Christina Jessen-Winge

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01015716 (Physical Exercise, Dietary Counseling and Cognitive Behavioral Training as a Combined Life-style Intervention to Reduce Weight and Increase Workability in Health Care Workers), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01015716 phase1completednot on this map

Physical Exercise, Dietary Counseling and Cognitive Behavioral Training as a Combined Life-style Intervention to Reduce Weight and Increase Workability in Health Care Workers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2009 to 2012Enrolled146ConditionsOverweight, Physical Capacity, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Work AbilityArmsIntervention-group, Control-group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeanette Reffstrup ChristensenDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløwsvej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. jrchristensen@health.sdu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2412-5989
Majda PajevicDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløwsvej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Pia Maria IlvigDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløwsvej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Karen SøgaardDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Christina Jessen-WingeDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Institute of Physiotherapy and Occupational therapy, Metropolitan University College, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of obesity has increased significantly worldwide within the last decade. As obesity is recognised as a contributing factor when developing various health threatening chronic diseases, prevention initiatives focusing on weight loss are becoming more important. Because of the time spent at the workplace, workplaces can be optimal arenas for weight loss programs and these programs have been effective to decrease body weight. Thus, reasons for engaging in weight loss interventions needs exploring, in order to engage more workplaces in weight loss interventions. Such information provides important knowledge that may help to inform decisions of municipalities, employers and other public health decision makers, when and if implementing weight loss interventions. The aim of this study was therefore to explore reasons for employee engagement in weight loss projects at the workplace and the incentives a municipality, a manager at a home-care centre, and a project manager have to launch such project.

methodsA stratified case study was conducted. A representative from the municipality, the manager at a home-care centre, the project manager of the weight loss intervention and six health-care workers were interviewed at the end of a one-year weight loss intervention at the workplace. Data were analysed using Systematic Text Condensation.

resultsAnalysis identified different views and considerations for engaging in a weight loss intervention at the workplace. For the representative of the municipality the possible economical gain of the project was in focus. The project manager and the manager of the home-care centre both reflected mainly on improvement of the healthcare workers health. For the project manager, achieving good scientific results was highlighted as well. However, the employees were influenced by several factors, such as their own health and weight loss, the pressure from the environment and their struggle for recognition.

conclusionsThis study concluded that if targeting the increasing worldwide obesity problem through workplace initiated weight loss programs, the sales pitch to managements and employers have to be tailored in order to increase the participation and the motivation for the initiative.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov : NCT01015716 , registration data 14.12.2010 (Prospectively registered).

Indexed as

Occupational HealthWeight Reduction ProgramsDenmarkHealth PersonnelHumansMotivationObesityQualitative ResearchHealth-care workersHealth personnelHealth-promotion programJoint responsibilityLifestyle engagementMunicipalitiesPhysical detoriationQualitative interviews

Identifiers

PMID30612549
PMCPMC6322224

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.