Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30617043›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Text Messaging to Enhance Mindfulness-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment: Program Development Through Qualitative Research.

Claire A Spears, Sharrill A Bell, Charlayne A Scarlett, Natalie K Anderson, Cherell Cottrell-Daniels, Sadaf Lotfalian, Maitreyi Bandlamudi, Amanda Grant, Anna Sigurdardottir, Brittani P Carter and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Momentary mindfulness versus distraction coping messages to reduce cannabis craving among young adults: A microrandomized trial.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Claire A SpearsDivision of Health Promotion and Behavior, Georgia State University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7869-5661
Sharrill A BellDivision of Health Promotion and Behavior, Georgia State University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2676-9497
Charlayne A ScarlettDivision of Health Promotion and Behavior, Georgia State University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4335-6686
Natalie K AndersonDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4440-2872
Cherell Cottrell-DanielsDivision of Health Promotion and Behavior, Georgia State University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5530-5088
Sadaf LotfalianDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2998-5918
Maitreyi BandlamudiDivision of Health Promotion and Behavior, Georgia State University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3859-1307
Amanda GrantDivision of Health Promotion and Behavior, Georgia State University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9510-7131
Anna SigurdardottirDivision of Health Promotion and Behavior, Georgia State University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5225-397X
Brittani P CarterDivision of Health Promotion and Behavior, Georgia State University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1520-5338
Lorien C AbromsPrevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6859-283X
David W WetterCenter for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-0108

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001067 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DERE, WILLARD H., HESS, RACHEL · 2013 to 2017
$19.8M
Novel use of mHealth data to identify states of vulnerability and receptivity to JITAIs SupplementU01CA229437 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NAHUM-SHANI, INBAL BILLIE, WETTER, DAVID W · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Using Mobile Technology to Understand and Encourage Mindfulness for Smoking CessaK23AT008442 · NCCIH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPEARS, CLAIRE ADAMS · 2014 to 2018
$623k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001067NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT008442NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NCI NIH HHS U01 CA229437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMindfulness-based programs show promise for promoting smoking cessation in diverse populations. Mobile health strategies could increase treatment engagement and in-the-moment support, thus enhancing the effects of mindfulness-based smoking cessation interventions. However, most mobile health programs have been developed without sufficient input from the target population.

objectiveBy eliciting input from the target population, predominantly low socioeconomic status (SES) African American adult smokers, throughout the development of an SMS (short message service) text messaging program that teaches mindfulness for smoking cessation, we aimed for the resulting program to be optimally effective and consistent with participants' needs and preferences.

methodsTwo qualitative studies (N=25) were conducted with predominantly low SES, African American adult smokers. In Study 1 (initial qualitative input; n=15), participants engaged in focus groups to provide suggestions for program development. In Study 2 (abbreviated trial; n=10), participants received a 1-week version of the SMS text messaging program and provided feedback through in-depth interviews.

resultsIn Study 1, participants suggested that the SMS text messaging program should be personalized and interactive (ie, involve two-way messaging); provide strategies for coping with cravings and recovering from smoking lapses; involve relatively short, to-the-point messages; and include pictures. In Study 2, participants were highly engaged with the texts, indicated that the program was useful, and provided additional suggestions for improvement.

conclusionsEliciting feedback from the target population throughout the intervention development process allowed for iterative revisions to increase feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness. Overall, SMS text messaging appears to be a feasible, appealing way to provide in-the-moment personalized support and encourage mindfulness among low-income African American smokers.

Indexed as

AdultDistrict of ColumbiaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMindfulnessProgram DevelopmentQualitative ResearchSmokersSmoking CessationSocial ClassText Messaginglow socioeconomic statusmobile phonequalitativeshort message service text messagingsmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID30617043
PMCPMC6329411

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.