ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018
Association between coronary artery atherosclerosis and plasma glucose levels assessed by dual-source computed tomography.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opinion: Are mental health benefits of the ketogenic diet accompanied by an increased risk of cardiovascular disease?Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- IGRNet: A Deep Learning Model for Non-Invasive, Real-Time Diagnosis of Prediabetes through Electrocardiograms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the association between coronary artery atherosclerosis (CAA) and plasma glucose parameters in a randomly selected cohort of asymptomatic, community-dwelling, Chinese adults by dual-source computed tomography (DSCT).
methodsWe randomly selected participants and classified them into three groups based on their plasma glucose levels: normal glucose regulation (NGR), pre-diabetes, and diabetes mellitus (DM). The participants underwent DSCT, and those identified with CAA were divided into four groups according to the severity of their coronary artery stenosis. We analyzed the composition of plaques in all coronary artery segments according to the American Heart Association's (AHA) guidelines. We compared the severity of coronary artery stenosis and the plaque composition with plasma glucose parameters among participants.
resultsOut of a total of 335 participants, 118 were found to have CAA. The prevalence of CAA was highest (P value for trend =0.031) in the diabetic group (67.7%) followed by the pre-diabetic group (35.1%) then the NGR group (27.7%). Both calcified and mixed plaques were found in the coronary arteries of the diabetic group while mixed and non-calcified plaques predominated in the pre-diabetic and the NGR groups. When data from all subjects with CAA were analyzed, blood glucose parameters, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hr postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), exhibited a positive correlation with the severity of coronary stenosis (P<0.05). Multivariable logistic regression models indicated a significantly higher risk of CAA among the diabetic patients. Triglyceride levels were positively correlated with the blood glucose parameters among the three groups while LDL-C was elevated in the DM group but not in the pre-diabetic group compared to the NGR group.
conclusionsThe severity of CAA exhibited a direct correlation with the blood glucose parameters, FPG, PPG, and HbA1c. DSCT can accurately detect the presence and distribution of CAA in asymptomatic, community-dwelling subjects. DSCT is a useful screening tool for coronary artery disease (CAD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.