Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30624655›Full record

ArticleILAR journal2018

Rational Design and In Vivo Characterization of Vaccine Adjuvants.

Signe Tandrup Schmidt, Gabriel Kristian Pedersen, Dennis Christensen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ILAR journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Sensitivity Comparison Experiment of Four Testing Methods forSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Signe Tandrup SchmidtStatens Serum Institut, Center for Vaccine Research, Department of Infectious Disease Immunology, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Gabriel Kristian PedersenStatens Serum Institut, Center for Vaccine Research, Department of Infectious Disease Immunology, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Dennis ChristensenStatens Serum Institut, Center for Vaccine Research, Department of Infectious Disease Immunology, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Statens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

Dissecting the mechanism of age-specific adjuvant synergy in vitro and in vivoU01AI124284 · NIAID · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEVY, OFER · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI124284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many different adjuvants are currently being developed for subunit vaccines against a number of pathogens and diseases. Rational design is increasingly used to develop novel vaccine adjuvants, which requires extensive knowledge of, for example, the desired immune responses, target antigen-presenting cell subsets, their localization, and expression of relevant pattern-recognition receptors. The adjuvant mechanism of action and efficacy are usually evaluated in animal models, where mice are by far the most used. In this review, we present methods for assessing adjuvant efficacy and function in animal models: (1) whole-body biodistribution evaluated by using fluorescently and radioactively labeled vaccine components; (2) association and activation of immune cell subsets at the injection site, in the draining lymph node, and the spleen; (4) adaptive immune responses, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, various T-helper cell subsets, and antibody responses, which may be quantitatively evaluated using ELISA, ELISPOT, and immunoplex assays and qualitatively evaluated using flow cytometric and single cell sequencing assays; and (5) effector responses, for example, antigen-specific cytotoxic potential of CD8+ T cells and antibody neutralization assays. While the vaccine-induced immune responses in mice often correlate with the responses induced in humans, there are instances where immune responses detected in mice are not translated to the human situation. We discuss some examples of correlation and discrepancy between mouse and human immune responses and how to understand them.

Indexed as

VaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunity, CellularAdjuvants, ImmunologicVaccinesadjuvantantibody responsesbiodistributioncell mediated immune responsescytotoxic T cell responsesimmunogenicity assessmentin vivo trackingvaccine

Identifiers

PMID30624655
PMCPMC6927902
OpenAlexW2963041013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.