Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30631428›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2018

Recent advances in renal imaging.

Joshua Thurman, Faikah Gueler

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Radiology of fibrosis part III: genitourinary system.Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Shear wave elastography in early diabetic kidney disease.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Sex effects in pyelonephritis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Renal statistical map for positron emission tomography with [O-15] water.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joshua ThurmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3476-9956
Faikah GuelerDepartment of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney diseases can be caused by a wide range of genetic, hemodynamic, toxic, infectious, and autoimmune factors. The diagnosis of kidney disease usually involves the biochemical analysis of serum and blood, but these tests are often insufficiently sensitive or specific to make a definitive diagnosis. Although radiologic imaging currently has a limited role in the evaluation of most kidney diseases, several new imaging methods hold great promise for improving our ability to non-invasively detect structural, functional, and molecular changes within the kidney. New methods, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI, allow functional imaging of the kidney. The use of novel contrast agents, such as microbubbles and nanoparticles, allows the detection of specific molecules in the kidney. These methods could greatly advance our ability to diagnose disease and also to safely monitor patients over time. This could improve the care of individual patients, and it could also facilitate the evaluation of new treatment strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast MediaHumansKidneyKidney DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyContrast MediadiagnosisfibrosisimaginginflammationKidney

Identifiers

PMID30631428
PMCPMC6281011
OpenAlexW2903040008

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.