Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30637947›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2019

Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes when initiating blood pressure lowering at baseline SBP between 130 and 140 mm Hg: A meta-analysis.

Shifei Wang, Nima Moumin Djama, Yanxian Lai, Hairui Li, Wangjun Liao, Yulin Liao, Jianping Bin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shifei WangDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Nima Moumin DjamaDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanxian LaiDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hairui LiDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wangjun LiaoDepartment of Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yulin LiaoDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianping BinDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4799-1502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of blood pressure (BP) lowering initiated at baseline systolic BP (SBP) of 130-140 mm Hg in patients with diabetes remain controversial. The authors aimed to investigate the benefits and harms of BP lowering initiated at these levels for patients with diabetes. Medline and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 10, 2018. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular events. Random-effects model was used to pool all the estimates. Six trials with 21 574 diabetics were included. In diabetics, initiating BP lowering at baseline SBP of 130 and 140 mm Hg did not reduce the rate of major cardiovascular events (RR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.93-1.10]), finding that was consistent in subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Moreover, BP lowering did not reduce the risks of myocardial infarction (RR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.85-1.16]), stroke (0.83 [95% CI, 0.54-1.27]), heart failure (0.91 [95% CI, 0.79-1.04]), albuminuria (0.93 [95% CI, 0.84-1.04]), end-stage renal disease (0.93 [95% CI, 0.70-1.24]), cardiovascular death (1.25 [95% CI, 0.90-1.74]) and all-cause death (1.05 [95% CI, 0.94-1.17]) in patients with diabetes and baseline SBP of 130-140 mm Hg but possibly increase the risks of serious adverse events (RR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.33-3.01]) and hypotension (5.30 [95% CI, 0.99-28.40]). In diabetics, initiating BP lowering at baseline SBP of 130-140 mm Hg may not produce any benefit but probably increase the risks of serious adverse events and hypotension. It may not be recommended to initiate BP lowering at a threshold of SBP lower than 140 mm Hg for diabetics.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHypertensionHypotensionTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressure loweringcardiovascular outcomediabeteshypertension

Identifiers

PMID30637947
PMCPMC8030568

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.