ArticleSexual medicine2019
Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction: A Double-Blind, Randomized-Control Trial Using Tadalafil.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations between phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and vascular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized-controlled trials.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Placebo Responses Among Men With Erectile Dysfunction Enrolled in Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2020Pooled it
- Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors as treatment for erectile dysfunction: a webinar-based poll unveiling perceptions of healthcare professionals.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2024Article
- The Effect of Phosphodiesterase-type 5 Inhibitors on Erectile Function: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess whether tadalafil improves endothelial dysfunction(EnD) in a placebo-controlled randomized-control trial.
methodsErectile dysfunction and EnD were assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery respectively, at baseline and 4 weeks by blinded observer. Patients with FMD of < 15% were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either placebo or tadalafil. Both placebo and tadalafil in similar-appearing capsules but coded separately, were dispensed by a blinded co-investigator. Compliance and drug-related events were recorded. The randomization codes were then decoded and appropriate statistical tests applied.
results89 patients were randomized and 82 completed the study. Both groups were comparable. Posttreatment, there were significant improvements in IIEF-5 score (pre- vs posttreatment; tadalafil: 11.432 vs 15.937, P < .001 and placebo 11.232 vs 14.935, P < .00) and FMD% pre- vs posttreatment; tadalafil: 11.222 vs 13.827, P < .001 and placebo: 11.617 vs 14.027, P < .001). Intergroup comparison did not show any significant difference in IIEF scores (mean change in tadalafil vs placebo group: 3.719 vs 4.433, P = .223) and FMD% (mean change tadalafil vs placebo group: 2.426 and 2.829, P = .528). The adverse events were significantly more in the tadalafil group (tadalafil vs placebo 14 adverse reactions [ADR] vs 5 ADR, P < .001).
conclusionThe response of low-dose tadalafil on IIEF and FMD is largely similar to placebo; however, the utility of FMD% in young patients and placebo effect needs to be studied further. Pattanaik S, Kaundal P, Mavuduru RS, et al. Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction: A Double-Blind, Randomized-Control Trial Using Tadalafil. Sex Med 2019;7:41-47.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.