Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30653502›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Modeling cell line-specific recruitment of signaling proteins to the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor.

Keesha E Erickson, Oleksii S Rukhlenko, Md Shahinuzzaman, Kalina P Slavkova, Yen Ting Lin, Ryan Suderman, Edward C Stites, Marian Anghel, Richard G Posner, Dipak Barua and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Keesha E EricksonTheoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Oleksii S RukhlenkoSystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1863-4987
Md ShahinuzzamanDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Missouri Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri, United States of America.
Kalina P SlavkovaTheoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Yen Ting LinTheoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-8423
Ryan SudermanTheoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5604-1387
Edward C StitesThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Marian AnghelInformation Sciences Group, Computer, Computational and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Richard G PosnerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0489-9397
Dipak BaruaDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Missouri Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8394-1233
Boris N KholodenkoSystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
William S HlavacekTheoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4383-8711
Los Alamos National Laboratory · USMissouri University of Science and Technology · USUniversity College Dublin · IENorthern Arizona University · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

Viral Vector Core (VVC)P30CA014195 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Alan Saghatelian · 1985 to 2026
$82.8M
Hardening Software for Rule-based models-Competitive RevisionR01GM111510 · NIGMS · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI HLAVACEK, WILLIAM S, POSNER, RICHARD G · 2014 to 2023
$2.8M
Computational Model of Autophagy-Mediated Survival in Chemoresistant Lung CancerR01CA197398 · NCI · VAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HLAVACEK, WILLIAM S, MACKEIGAN, JEFFREY PAUL · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014195NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197398NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) typically contain multiple autophosphorylation sites in their cytoplasmic domains. Once activated, these autophosphorylation sites can recruit downstream signaling proteins containing Src homology 2 (SH2) and phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domains, which recognize phosphotyrosine-containing short linear motifs (SLiMs). These domains and SLiMs have polyspecific or promiscuous binding activities. Thus, multiple signaling proteins may compete for binding to a common SLiM and vice versa. To investigate the effects of competition on RTK signaling, we used a rule-based modeling approach to develop and analyze models for ligand-induced recruitment of SH2/PTB domain-containing proteins to autophosphorylation sites in the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) receptor (IGF1R). Models were parameterized using published datasets reporting protein copy numbers and site-specific binding affinities. Simulations were facilitated by a novel application of model restructuration, to reduce redundancy in rule-derived equations. We compare predictions obtained via numerical simulation of the model to those obtained through simple prediction methods, such as through an analytical approximation, or ranking by copy number and/or KD value, and find that the simple methods are unable to recapitulate the predictions of numerical simulations. We created 45 cell line-specific models that demonstrate how early events in IGF1R signaling depend on the protein abundance profile of a cell. Simulations, facilitated by model restructuration, identified pairs of IGF1R binding partners that are recruited in anti-correlated and correlated fashions, despite no inclusion of cooperativity in our models. This work shows that the outcome of competition depends on the physicochemical parameters that characterize pairwise interactions, as well as network properties, including network connectivity and the relative abundances of competitors.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBinding SitesCell LineCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyHumansMicePhosphorylationProtein BindingProteinsReceptor, IGF Type 1Signal Transductionsrc Homology DomainsProteinsReceptor, IGF Type 1

Identifiers

PMID30653502
PMCPMC6353226
OpenAlexW2907053009

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.