Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30654798›Full record

Trial reportRespiratory research2019

Continuous exercise induces airway epithelium damage while a matched-intensity and volume intermittent exercise does not.

Adrien Combes, Jeanne Dekerle, Xavier Dumont, Rosie Twomey, Alfred Bernard, Frédéric Daussin, Valérie Bougault

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Respiratory research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exercise sustains the hallmarks of health.Journal of sport and health science · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The active grandparent hypothesis: Physical activity and the evolution of extended human healthspans and lifespans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adrien CombesURePSSS, Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société, Lille, France.
Jeanne DekerleFatigue and Exercise Laboratory, Centre for Sport Exercise Science and Medicine (SESAME), University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
Xavier DumontLouvain Center of Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Rosie TwomeyFatigue and Exercise Laboratory, Centre for Sport Exercise Science and Medicine (SESAME), University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
Alfred BernardLouvain Center of Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Frédéric DaussinURePSSS, Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société, Lille, France.
Valérie BougaultURePSSS, Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société, Lille, France. valerie.bougault@univ-lille2.fr.

Funding

ComUE Lille Nord de France No number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile continuous exercise (CE) induces greater ventilation ([Formula: see text]

methodsSixteen healthy young adults performed a 30-min continuous (CE) and a 60-min intermittent exercise (IE; 1-min work: 1-min rest) on separate occasions in a random order. Intensity was set at 70% of their maximum work rate (WR

resultsMean [Formula: see text]

conclusionThe 30-min CE performed at 70% WR

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersExerciseExercise TestHeart RateHumansInflammation MediatorsLung Volume MeasurementsMaleRespiratory MucosaRespiratory RateYoung AdultBiomarkersInflammation MediatorsCC16Minute ventilationPneumoproteinsSP-DType of exercise

Identifiers

PMID30654798
PMCPMC6337858

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.