SynthesisHerz2020
Preventive use of carvedilol for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Herz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Renin-angiotensin System Antagonists and Beta-blockers in Prevention of Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Pooled it
- Preventive use of beta-blockers for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: A network meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Cardiotoxic Effect of Modern Anthracycline Dosing on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Placebo Arms From Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Pooled it
- Prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Pooled it
- The efficacy of carvedilol in improving cardiac function and survival in patients with anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Prevention and treatment of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Prevention of Anthracyclines and HER2 Inhibitor-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2024Review
- Effects of Carvedilol on Blood Pressure, Blood Sugar, and Blood Lipids in Elderly Patients with Refractory Hypertension.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical or subclinical cardiotoxicity is a concern for cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Carvedilol is promising for preventing anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC). This review appraised the preventive effects of carvedilol against AIC based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsThe Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched from inception to March 27, 2018. RCTs using carvedilol for the prevention of AIC were selected. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed. Meta-analysis was conducted, when applicable, for the trial endpoints; otherwise the data were analyzed descriptively.
resultsNine RCTs comprising 717 patients were selected. The risk of bias was unclear and the methodological quality differed substantially. Data pooling of five eligible studies indicated no decreased mortality in patients receiving carvedilol (risk difference = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.07-0.04, p = 0.57, I
conclusionPreventive use of carvedilol in patients undergoing anthracycline-based chemotherapy may be associated with a reduced incidence of LVSD, higher LVEF value, better diastolic function, and lower troponin I level. RCTs with larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed to verify these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.