Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656607›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2019

The RANK-RANKL axis: an opportunity for drug repurposing in cancer?

S Peters, P Clézardin, I Márquez-Rodas, D Niepel, C Gedye

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. RANKL biology.Bone · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. RANK-RANKL Signaling in Cancer of the Uterine Cervix: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

S PetersDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
P ClézardinINSERM, UMR 1033, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Villeurbanne, France.
I Márquez-RodasServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
D NiepelGlobal Medical Affairs, Amgen (GmbH) Europe, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
C GedyeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, Australia. craig.gedye@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1629-4352
Amgen (Switzerland) · CHCalvary Mater Newcastle Hospital · AUHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug repurposing offers advantages over traditional drug development in terms of cost, speed and improved patient outcomes. The receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) ligand (RANKL) inhibitor denosumab is approved for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone, including solid tumours and multiple myeloma. Following improved understanding of the role of RANK/RANKL in cancer biology, denosumab has already been repurposed as a treatment for giant cell tumour of bone. Here, we review the role of RANK/RANKL in tumourigenesis, including effects on tumour initiation, progression and metastasis and consider the impact of RANK/RANKL on tumour immunology and immune evasion. Finally, we look briefly at ongoing trials and future opportunities for therapeutic synergy when combining denosumab with anti-cancer agents such as immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsPrognosisRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BAntineoplastic AgentsRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BTNFRSF11A protein, humanTNFSF11 protein, humanCheckpointDenosumabImmunotherapyOsteoprotegerinRANKRANKL

Identifiers

PMID30656607
OpenAlexW2909692066

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.