SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019
General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 86 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Economic Evaluation of an Online Screening Tool With Selective Follow-up Versus Periodic Health Screening by the Occupational Physician
Healthy Ageing - an Interdisciplinary Randomised Study of Health Dialogues in Primary Care
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The Swedish model of health dialogues, a combined individual- and community-based primary preventive program for cardiovascular disease, is associated with reduced mortality: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Cost-Effectiveness of Population Screening Programs for Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- User-defined outcomes of the Danish cardiovascular screening (DANCAVAS) trial: A post hoc analyses of a population-based, randomised controlled trial.PLoS medicine · 2024Trial
- Results from the BETTER WISE trial: a pragmatic cluster two arm parallel randomized controlled trial for primary prevention and screening in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC primary care · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Using general practitioners to recruit individuals with low socioeconomic position to preventive health checks is feasible: a cross sectional study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2019Trial
- Detection of previously undiagnosed conditions in midlife preventive health examinations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of check-up 35 for detecting targeted diseases in Germany.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Impact of Secondary Prevention on Mortality in the Building Trades National Medical Screening Program: Effectiveness of Occupational High-Risk Management.American journal of industrial medicine · 2026Article
- From Assessment to Impact: How Workplace Health Screening Informs Staff Wellbeing in a University Setting.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Impact of a provider-level incentive on smoking cessation treatment use: A secondary dataset analysis using administrative claims data and a cross-sectional survey in Japanese health check-up settings (N-EQUITY2203).Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- Routine health checkups and cognitive resilience among older survivors of the 2011 Japan Tsunami.npj natural hazards · 2026Article
- Effects of a two-night hospitalization program as a specific health guidance on obesity and cardiovascular disease risk factors.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Biomarkers of aging: from molecules and surrogates to physiology and function.Physiological reviews · 2025Review
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeneral health checks are common elements of health care in some countries. They aim to detect disease and risk factors for disease with the purpose of reducing morbidity and mortality. Most of the commonly used individual screening tests offered in general health checks have been incompletely studied. Also, screening leads to increased use of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, which can be harmful as well as beneficial. It is therefore important to assess whether general health checks do more good than harm. This is the first update of the review published in 2012.
objectivesTo quantify the benefits and harms of general health checks. SEARCH
methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases and two trials registers on 31 January 2018. Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts, assessed papers for eligibility and read reference lists. One review author used citation tracking (Web of Knowledge) and asked trial authors about additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials comparing health checks with no health checks in adults unselected for disease or risk factors. We did not include geriatric trials. We defined health checks as screening for more than one disease or risk factor in more than one organ system. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. We contacted trial authors for additional outcomes or trial details when necessary. When possible, we analysed the results with a random-effects model meta-analysis; otherwise, we did a narrative synthesis. MAIN
resultsWe included 17 trials, 15 of which reported outcome data (251,891 participants). Risk of bias was generally low for our primary outcomes. Health checks have little or no effect on total mortality (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 1.03; 11 trials; 233,298 participants and 21,535 deaths; high-certainty evidence, I AUTHORS'
conclusionsGeneral health checks are unlikely to be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.