Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30712509›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Investigation of multi-trait associations using pathway-based analysis of GWAS summary statistics.

Guangsheng Pei, Hua Sun, Yulin Dai, Xiaoming Liu, Zhongming Zhao, Peilin Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Charting the proteome landscape in major psychiatric disorders: From biomarkers to biological pathways towards drug discovery.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guangsheng PeiCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin St. Suite 820, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Hua SunCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin St. Suite 820, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Yulin DaiCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin St. Suite 820, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Xiaoming LiuHuman Genetics Center, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Zhongming ZhaoCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin St. Suite 820, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. zhongming.zhao@uth.tmc.edu.
Peilin JiaCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin St. Suite 820, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. peilin.jia@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

Transforming dbGaP genetic and genomic data to FAIR-ready by artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithmsR01LM012806 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Zhongming Zhao · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Mapping the Genetic Architecture of Complex Disease via RNA-seq and GWAS DataR01LM011177 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LILY, ZHAO, ZHONGMING · 2012 to 2014
$1.0M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011177NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been successful in identifying disease-associated genetic variants. Recently, an increasing number of GWAS summary statistics have been made available to the research community, providing extensive repositories for studies of human complex diseases. In particular, cross-trait associations at the genetic level can be beneficial from large-scale GWAS summary statistics by using genetic variants that are associated with multiple traits. However, direct assessment of cross-trait associations using susceptibility loci has been challenging due to the complex genetic architectures in most diseases, calling for advantageous methods that could integrate functional interpretation and imply biological mechanisms.

resultsWe developed an analytical framework for systematic integration of cross-trait associations. It incorporates two different approaches to detect enriched pathways and requires only summary statistics. We demonstrated the framework using 25 traits belonging to four phenotype groups. Our results revealed an average of 54 significantly associated pathways (ranged between 18 and 175) per trait. We further proved that pathway-based analysis provided increased power to estimate cross-trait associations compared to gene-level analysis. Based on Fisher's Exact Test (FET), we identified a total of 24 (53) pairs of trait-trait association at adjusted p

conclusionsOur study revealed that risk variants for 25 different traits aggregated in particular biological pathways and that these pathways were frequently shared among traits. Our results confirmed known mechanisms and also suggested several novel insights into the etiology of multi-traits.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, StatisticalQuantitative Trait, HeritableSignal TransductionComorbidityGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociWorkflowCross-trait associationGWASMulti-dimensional scalingPathway enrichment analysisPleiotropy abbreviationsSummary statistics

Identifiers

PMID30712509
PMCPMC6360716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.