ArticleThe ISME journal2019
Evolution of substrate-specific gene expression and RNA editing in brown rot wood-decaying fungi.
Article in The ISME journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Analysis of Lifecycle-Dependent A to I RNA Editing in Three Members of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative transcriptomics reveals unique pine wood decay strategies in the Sparassis latifolia.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- RNA Modification and Its Implication in Plant Pathogenic Fungi.The plant pathology journal · 2021Review
- RNA-editing in Basidiomycota, revisited.ISME communications · 2021Article
- Comparative transcriptional analyses of Pleurotus ostreatus mutants on beech wood and rice straw shed light on substrate-biased gene regulation.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Wood-water relationships and their role for wood susceptibility to fungal decay.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Insights into the cellulose degradation mechanism of the thermophilic fungusBiotechnology for biofuels · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2021-12-01Error in Analyses · Error in Methods ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungi that decay wood have characteristic associations with certain tree species, but the mechanistic bases for these associations are poorly understood. We studied substrate-specific gene expression and RNA editing in six species of wood-decaying fungi from the 'Antrodia clade' (Polyporales, Agaricomycetes) on three different wood substrates (pine, spruce, and aspen) in submerged cultures. We identified dozens to hundreds of substrate-biased genes (i.e., genes that are significantly upregulated in one substrate relative to the other two substrates) in each species, and these biased genes are correlated with their host ranges. Evolution of substrate-biased genes is associated with gene family expansion, gain and loss of genes, and variation in cis- and trans- regulatory elements, rather than changes in protein coding sequences. We also demonstrated widespread RNA editing events in the Antrodia clade, which differ from those observed in the Ascomycota in their distribution, substitution types, and the genomic environment. Moreover, we found that substrates could affect editing positions and frequency, including editing events occurring in mRNA transcribed from wood-decay-related genes. This work shows the extent to which gene expression and RNA editing differ among species and substrates, and provides clues into mechanisms by which wood-decaying fungi may adapt to different hosts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.