Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30753188›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Conserved regulation of neurodevelopmental processes and behavior by FoxP in Drosophila.

Anna Castells-Nobau, Ilse Eidhof, Michaela Fenckova, Dova B Brenman-Suttner, Jolanda M Scheffer-de Gooyert, Sheren Christine, Rosa L Schellevis, Kiran van der Laan, Christine Quentin, Lisa van Ninhuijs and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The effect of microbiome on social spacing inmicroPublication biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The making of the Drosophila mushroom body.Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring the Genetic Conception of Obesity via the Dual Role of FoxO.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Inheritance of pheromone profiles from agedmicroPublication biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Unraveling Human Brain Development and Evolution Using Organoid Models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  19. Identification ofOpen biology · 2020
    Article
  20. Abnormal Social Interactions in aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna Castells-NobauDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6024-8353
Ilse EidhofDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1567-3078
Michaela FenckovaDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Dova B Brenman-SuttnerDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jolanda M Scheffer-de GooyertDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Sheren ChristineDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Rosa L SchellevisDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6939-8358
Kiran van der LaanDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0889-207X
Christine QuentinGenetics, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lisa van NinhuijsDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Falko HofmannDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5032-0411
Radoslaw EjsmontMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (MPI-CBG), Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7176-7848
Simon E FisherLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute of Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jamie M KramerDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Stephan J SigristGenetics, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anne F SimonDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6509-4541
Annette SchenckDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6918-3314
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLFreie Universität Berlin · DEWestern University · CAMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FOXP proteins form a subfamily of evolutionarily conserved transcription factors involved in the development and functioning of several tissues, including the central nervous system. In humans, mutations in FOXP1 and FOXP2 have been implicated in cognitive deficits including intellectual disability and speech disorders. Drosophila exhibits a single ortholog, called FoxP, but due to a lack of characterized mutants, our understanding of the gene remains poor. Here we show that the dimerization property required for mammalian FOXP function is conserved in Drosophila. In flies, FoxP is enriched in the adult brain, showing strong expression in ~1000 neurons of cholinergic, glutamatergic and GABAergic nature. We generate Drosophila loss-of-function mutants and UAS-FoxP transgenic lines for ectopic expression, and use them to characterize FoxP function in the nervous system. At the cellular level, we demonstrate that Drosophila FoxP is required in larvae for synaptic morphogenesis at axonal terminals of the neuromuscular junction and for dendrite development of dorsal multidendritic sensory neurons. In the developing brain, we find that FoxP plays important roles in α-lobe mushroom body formation. Finally, at a behavioral level, we show that Drosophila FoxP is important for locomotion, habituation learning and social space behavior of adult flies. Our work shows that Drosophila FoxP is important for regulating several neurodevelopmental processes and behaviors that are related to human disease or vertebrate disease model phenotypes. This suggests a high degree of functional conservation with vertebrate FOXP orthologues and established flies as a model system for understanding FOXP related pathologies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBehavior, AnimalBrainConserved SequenceDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsGene Knockdown TechniquesLocomotionMushroom BodiesNervous SystemReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensory Receptor CellsTwo-Hybrid System TechniquesDrosophila ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsFoxP protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID30753188
PMCPMC6372147
OpenAlexW2914161539

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.